Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34404247›Full record

SynthesisCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2022

A systematic review of treatment for patients with burning mouth syndrome.

Huann Lan Tan, Jared G Smith, Jan Hoffmann, Tara Renton

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06217731 (Inflammatory Markers in Saliva of Patients With Burning Mouth Syndrome Before and After Treatment With Low-Level Laser Therapy and Clonazepam), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06217731 nacompletednot on this map

Inflammatory Markers in Saliva of Patients With Burning Mouth Syndrome Before and After Treatment With Low-Level Laser Therapy and Clonazepam: A Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de MurciaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsBurning Mouth SyndromeArmsLaser+clonazepam, Laser Sham, Laser, Clonazepam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. [Evaluation of the Effects of Body Scan Mindfulness Training in Patients With Burning Mouth Syndrome].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. VortioxetineCurrent neuropharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Diseases of the tongue: a review of etiologies and treatments.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effects ofIntegrative medicine research · 2026
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Huann Lan TanFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Science, King's College London, London, UK.
Jared G SmithPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Jan HoffmannWolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2103-9081
Tara RentonFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Science, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBNational University of Malaysia · MYSt George's, University of London · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBurning mouth syndrome is a chronic idiopathic intractable intraoral dysaesthesia that remains a challenge to clinicians due to its poorly understood pathogenesis and inconsistent response to various treatments.

aimThis review aimed to study the short- (≤3 months) and long-term (>3 months) effectiveness and sustainable benefit of different burning mouth syndrome treatment strategies and the associated side effects. MATERIALS AND

methodsRandomised controlled trials of burning mouth syndrome treatment compared with placebo or other interventions with a minimum follow up of 2 months were searched from the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane database (published to July 2020).

resultsTwenty-two studies were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and analysed. Nine categories of burning mouth syndrome treatment were identified: Anticonvulsant and antidepressant agents, phytomedicine and alpha lipoic acid supplements, low-level laser therapy, saliva substitute, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and cognitive behaviour therapy. Cognitive behaviour therapy, topical capsaicin and clonazepam, and laser therapy demonstrated favourable outcome in both short- and long-term assessment. Phytomedicines reported a short-term benefit in pain score reduction. The pooled effect of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) pain score improvement was low, but its positive effects increased in long term assessment.

conclusionA more significant volume in terms of sample size, multi-centres, and multi-arm comparison of therapeutic agents with placebo and longitudinal follow-up studies is recommended to establish a standardised burning mouth syndrome treatment protocol. Further studies are required to assess the analgesic benefits of topical clonazepam and capsaicin, alternative medicines with neurodegenerative prevention capability and psychology support in treating burning mouth syndrome and reducing systemic adverse drug reactions.

Indexed as

Burning Mouth SyndromeThioctic AcidCapsaicinClonazepamHumansPainCapsaicinClonazepamThioctic AcidBurning mouth syndromeglossodyniasystematic reviewtreatment

Identifiers

PMID34404247
PMCPMC8793318
OpenAlexW3193430893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.