ArticleOpen biology2021
Comparative analysis of stalked and acorn barnacle adhesive proteomes.
Article in Open biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recombinant Proteins: A Molecular Tool to Understand Marine Adhesion and to Advance Biomaterials.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Proteomic comparison of the organic matrices from parietal and base plates of the acorn barnacleOpen biology · 2024Article
- Self-assembly of a barnacle cement protein into intertwined amyloid fibres and determination of their adhesive and viscoelastic properties.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Recent advances in biomimetic hemostatic materials.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- High Performance Marine and Terrestrial Bioadhesives and the Biomedical Applications They Have Inspired.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Adhesive Materials Inspired by Barnacle Underwater Adhesion: Biological Principles and Biomimetic Designs.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Comparative analysis of stalked and acorn barnacle adhesive proteomes.Open biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Barnacles interest the scientific community for multiple reasons: their unique evolutionary trajectory, vast diversity and economic impact-as a harvested food source and also as one of the most prolific macroscopic hard biofouling organisms. A common, yet novel, trait among barnacles is adhesion, which has enabled a sessile adult existence and global colonization of the oceans. Barnacle adhesive is primarily composed of proteins, but knowledge of how the adhesive proteome varies across the tree of life is unknown due to a lack of genomic information. Here, we supplement previous mass spectrometry analyses of barnacle adhesive with recently sequenced genomes to compare the adhesive proteomes of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.