Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34403823›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2021

The association between the COVID-19 pandemic and postpartum care provision.

Allie Sakowicz, Chloe N Matovina, Sidney K Imeroni, Maya Daiter, Olivia Barry, William A Grobman, Emily S Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Postpartum care utilization among high-risk pregnancies in an urban safety-net health system.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The impact on postpartum care by telehealth: a retrospective cohort study.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The Future of Remote Monitoring for Pregnancy.Bridge (Washington, D.C. : 1969) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Allie SakowiczNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Mses Sakowicz, Matovina, Imeroni, and Daiter). Electronic address: Allison.Sakowicz@northwestern.edu.
Chloe N MatovinaNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Mses Sakowicz, Matovina, Imeroni, and Daiter).
Sidney K ImeroniNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Mses Sakowicz, Matovina, Imeroni, and Daiter).
Maya DaiterNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Mses Sakowicz, Matovina, Imeroni, and Daiter).
Olivia BarryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Dr Barry).
William A GrobmanDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Drs Grobman and Miller).
Emily S MillerDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Drs Grobman and Miller).

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to a rapid transformation in the healthcare system to mitigate viral exposure. In the perinatal context, one change included altering the prenatal visit cadence and increasing the utilization of telehealth methods. Whether this approach had inadvertent negative implications for postpartum care, including postpartum depression screening and contraceptive utilization, is unknown.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine whether preventative health service utilization, including postpartum depression screening and contraceptive utilization, differed during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with the prepandemic period. STUDY

designThis retrospective cohort study included all pregnant patients who received prenatal care at 1 of 5 academic obstetrical practices and who delivered at Northwestern Memorial Hospital either before (delivery from September 1, 2018, to January 1, 2019) or during (delivery from February 1, 2020, to May 15, 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. Completion of postpartum depression screening was assessed by reviewing standardized fields in the documentation associated with the screening in the electronic health record system. The method of contraception used was ascertained from the postpartum clinical documentation. Patients were classified as initiating long-acting reversible contraception use if they received NEXPLANON (etonogestrel implant) or an intrauterine device during the hospitalization for delivery or within 3 months following delivery. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed.

resultsOf the 2375 pregnant patients included in this study, 1120 (47%) delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pregnant patients who delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic were significantly less likely to have undergone postpartum depression screening (45.5% vs 86.2%; P<.01); this association persisted after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.16). Pregnant patients who delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic also were significantly less likely to initiate long-acting reversible contraception use within 3 months of delivery (13.5% vs 19.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.84).

conclusionThe onset of the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a decrease in the completion of postpartum depression screenings and fewer patients initiating long-acting reversible contraception use overall. These results can inform adaptations in healthcare delivery in the midst of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsFemaleHumansPostnatal CarePostpartum PeriodPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2contraceptionCOVID-19 pandemicdepression screeninghealth servicesLARClong-acting reversible contraceptionpostpartum depression

Identifiers

PMID34403823
PMCPMC8364402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.