ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2021
Performance of noninvasive tools for identification of minimal liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B virus infection.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analytical validation of a LC-MS/MS based in vitro diagnostic kit for the quantification of L-tyrosine and taurocholic acid for liver fibrosis diagnosis.Practical laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Performance of noninvasive tools for identification of minimal liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B virus infection.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVarious noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment tools are available. Here, we evaluated the performance of the asparagine aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), transient elastography (TE), and the globulin-platelet (GP) ratio for identifying liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.
methodsA total of 146 patients were assessed using TE, FIB-4, APRI, the GP ratio, and liver biopsy. Three patient grouping methods were applied: any fibrosis (AF; F0 vs. F1/2/3/4); moderate fibrosis (MF; F0/1 vs. F2/3/4); and severe fibrosis (SF; F0/1/2 vs. F3/4). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, univariate analyses, and multivariate logistic regression were conducted.
resultsRegardless of patient-grouping method, the area under the curve (AUC) of TE and the GP ratio were similar. Using the AF grouping method, the GP ratio showed superior performance compared with APRI and FIB-4: the AUCs for the GP ratio, TE, APRI, and FIB-4 were 0.76, 0.75, 0.70, and 0.66, respectively. Using the MF grouping method, the GP ratio also showed superior performance compared with APRI and FIB-4: the AUCs for the GP ratio, TE, APRI, and FIB-4 were 0.66, 0.68, 0.57, and 0.53, respectively. Using the SF grouping method, the AUCs for the GP ratio, TE, APRI, and FIB-4 were not significantly different.
conclusionCompared with FIB-4 and APRI, the GP ratio had higher accuracy for identifying liver fibrosis, especially early-stage fibrosis, in patients with HBV infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.