Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34403475›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021

Deep Learning for Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Fused With Heterogeneous Data From EHRs Can Lead to Earlier Referral Decisions.

Min-Yen Hsu, Jeng-Yuan Chiou, Jung-Tzu Liu, Chee-Ming Lee, Ya-Wen Lee, Chien-Chih Chou, Shih-Chang Lo, Edy Kornelius, Yi-Sun Yang, Sung-Yen Chang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Multimodality Fusion Strategies in Eye Disease Diagnosis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Min-Yen HsuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Jeng-Yuan ChiouDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Jung-Tzu LiuComputational Intelligence Technology Center, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chee-Ming LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ya-Wen LeeComputational Intelligence Technology Center, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chien-Chih ChouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shih-Chang LoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Edy KorneliusDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yi-Sun YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Sung-Yen ChangComputational Intelligence Technology Center, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yu-Cheng LiuComputational Intelligence Technology Center, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chien-Ning HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Vincent S TsengDepartment of Computer Science, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chung Shan Medical University · TWIndustrial Technology Research Institute · TWChung Shan Medical University Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Fundus images are typically used as the sole training input for automated diabetic retinopathy (DR) classification. In this study, we considered several well-known DR risk factors and attempted to improve the accuracy of DR screening. Metphods: Fusing nonimage data (e.g., age, gender, smoking status, International Classification of Disease code, and laboratory tests) with data from fundus images can enable an end-to-end deep learning architecture for DR screening. We propose a neural network that simultaneously trains heterogeneous data and increases the performance of DR classification in terms of sensitivity and specificity. In the current retrospective study, 13,410 fundus images and their corresponding nonimage data were collected from the Chung Shan Medical University Hospital in Taiwan. The images were classified as either nonreferable or referable for DR by a panel of ophthalmologists. Cross-validation was used for the training models and to evaluate the classification performance. Results: The proposed fusion model achieved 97.96% area under the curve with 96.84% sensitivity and 89.44% specificity for determining referable DR from multimodal data, and significantly outperformed the models that used image or nonimage information separately. Conclusions: The fusion model with heterogeneous data has the potential to improve referable DR screening performance for earlier referral decisions. Translational Relevance: Artificial intelligence fused with heterogeneous data from electronic health records could provide earlier referral decisions from DR screening.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyArtificial IntelligenceHumansReferral and ConsultationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34403475
PMCPMC8374997
OpenAlexW3195158041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.