Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34403407›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Pharmacological blood pressure control and outcomes in patients with hypertensive crisis discharged from the emergency department.

Yu-Ting Lin, Yen-Hung Liu, Ya-Luan Hsiao, Hsiu-Yin Chiang, Pei-Shan Chen, Shih-Ni Chang, Hsiu-Chen Tsai, Chun-Hung Chen, Chin-Chi Kuo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Hypertensive emergencies and urgencies: a preliminary report of the ongoing Italian multicentric study ERIDANO.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Ting LinBig Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4821-9680
Yen-Hung LiuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ya-Luan HsiaoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Hsiu-Yin ChiangBig Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Pei-Shan ChenBig Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shih-Ni ChangBig Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hsiu-Chen TsaiBig Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chun-Hung ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chin-Chi KuoBig Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
China Medical University · TWJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacological blood pressure (BP) intervention for high blood pressure is controversial for a wide spectrum of hypertensive crisis in the emergency department (ED). We evaluated whether medical control of BP altered the short- and long-term outcomes among patients with hypertensive crisis who were discharged from the ED under universal health care. This retrospective cohort comprised 22 906 adults discharged from the ED of a tertiary hospital with initial systolic BP ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 120 mmHg between 2010 and 2016. The main exposure was the use of antihypertensive medication during the ED stay. Clinical endpoints were revisits to the ED or inpatient admission (at 7, 30, and 60 days), cardiovascular mortality (at 1, 3, and 5 years), and incident stroke (at 1, 3, and 5 years). The associations between pharmacological intervention for BP and outcomes were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models. Of the patient data analyzed, 72.2% were not treated pharmacologically and 68.4% underwent evaluation of end-organ damage. Pharmacological intervention for BP was significantly associated with a 11% and 11% reduced risk of hospital revisits within 30 or 60 days of discharge from ED, respectively, particularly among patients with polypharmacy. No association between pharmacological intervention for BP and incident stroke and cardiovascular mortality was observed. A revision of diagnostic criteria for hypertensive crisis is essential. Although pharmacological intervention for BP may not alter the long-term risk of cardiovascular mortality, it significantly reduces short-term health care utilization.

Indexed as

HypertensionModels, CardiovascularPatient DischargeStrokeAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID34403407
PMCPMC8370605
OpenAlexW3193464667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.