Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34403359›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of endocrinology2021

Genetic evaluation supports differential diagnosis in adolescent patients with delayed puberty.

Tansit Saengkaew, Heena R Patel, Kausik Banerjee, Gary Butler, Mehul T Dattani, Michael McGuigan, Helen L Storr, Ruben H Willemsen, Leo Dunkel, Sasha R Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Disorders of puberty and neurodevelopment: A shared etiology?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetics of pubertal delay.Clinical endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tansit SaengkaewCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0435-504X
Heena R PatelCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Kausik BanerjeeDepartment of Paediatrics, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Gary ButlerDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Endocrinology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mehul T DattaniDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Endocrinology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Michael McGuiganDepartment of Paediatrics, Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK.
Helen L StorrCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ruben H WillemsenDepartment of Paediatric Endocrinology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Leo DunkelCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Sasha R HowardCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6698-903X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPubertal delay can be the clinical presentation of both idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH) and self-limited delayed puberty (SLDP). Distinction between these conditions is a common but important diagnostic challenge in adolescents.

objectiveTo assess whether gene panel testing can assist with clinical differential diagnosis and to allow accurate and timely management of delayed puberty patients.

designRetrospective study.

methodsPatients presenting with delayed puberty to UK Paediatric services, followed up to final diagnosis, were included. Whole-exome sequencing was analysed using a virtual panel of genes previously reported to cause either IHH or SLDP to identify rarely predicted deleterious variants. Deleterious variants were verified by in silico prediction tools. The correlation between clinical and genotype diagnosis was analysed.

resultsForty-six patients were included, 54% with a final clinical diagnosis of SLDP and 46% with IHH. Red flags signs of IHH were present in only three patients. Fifteen predicted deleterious variants in 12 genes were identified in 33% of the cohort, with most inherited in a heterozygous manner. A fair correlation between final clinical diagnosis and genotypic diagnosis was found. Panel testing was able to confirm a diagnosis of IHH in patients with pubertal delay. Genetic analysis identified three patients with IHH that had been previously diagnosed as SLDP.

conclusionThis study supports the use of targeted exome sequencing in the clinical setting to aid the differential diagnosis between IHH and SLDP in adolescents presenting with pubertal delay. Genetic evaluation thus facilitates earlier and more precise diagnosis, allowing clinicians to direct treatment appropriately.

Indexed as

AdolescentCohort StudiesComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDiagnosis, DifferentialExomeExome SequencingFemaleGenetic TestingGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansHypogonadismMalePredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID34403359
PMCPMC8558847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.