Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34403280›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021

Speech-in-Speech Recognition and Spatially Selective Attention in Children and Adults.

Stacey G Kane, Kelly M Dean, Emily Buss

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacey G KaneDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0002-8459-0858
Kelly M DeanDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Emily BussDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID 0000-0001-8244-3013
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

DEVELOPMENT AND PLASTICITY IN NORMAL AND IMPAIRED EARSR01DC000397 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSS, EMILY · 1988 to 2016
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Knowing target location can improve adults' speech-in-speech recognition in complex auditory environments, but it is unknown whether young children listen selectively in space. This study evaluated masked word recognition with and without a pretrial cue to location to characterize the influence of listener age and masker type on the benefit of spatial cues. Method Participants were children (5-13 years of age) and adults with normal hearing. Testing occurred in a 180° arc of 11 loudspeakers. Targets were spondees produced by a female talker and presented from a randomly selected loudspeaker; that location was either known, based on a pretrial cue, or unknown. Maskers were two sequences comprising spondees or speech-shaped noise bursts, each presented from a random loudspeaker. Speech maskers were produced by one male talker or by three talkers, two male and one female. Results Children and adults benefited from the pretrial cue to target location with the three-voice masker, and the magnitude of benefit increased with increasing child age. There was no benefit of location cues in the one-voice or noise-burst maskers. Incorrect responses in the three-voice masker tended to correspond to masker words produced by the female talker, and in the location-known condition, those masker intrusions were more likely near the cued loudspeaker for both age groups. Conclusions Increasing benefit of the location cue with increasing child age in the three-voice masker suggests maturation of spatially selective attention, but error patterns do not support this idea. Differences in performance in the location-unknown condition could play a role in the differential benefit of the location cue.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionAdultAttentionChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleNoisePerceptual Masking

Identifiers

PMID34403280
PMCPMC8642097
OpenAlexW3193802304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.