Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34403073›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2022

Development of In Vitro Endothelialised Stents - Review.

Jitsuro Tsukada, P Mela, M Jinzaki, H Tsukada, T Schmitz-Rode, F Vogt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Applying Principles of Regenerative Medicine to Vascular Stent Development.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jitsuro TsukadaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchikamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8610, Japan. tsukada.jitsuro@nihon-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-5951-504X
P MelaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Munich School of BioEngineering, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 15, Garching, Munich, 85748, Germany.
M JinzakiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35, Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
H TsukadaDepartment of Surgery II, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1, Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan.
T Schmitz-RodeAME - Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, Aachen, 52074, Germany.
F VogtDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, Aachen, 52074, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEKeio University · JPNihon University · JPTechnical University of Munich · DETokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular treatment is prevalent as a primary treatment for coronary and peripheral arterial diseases. Although the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) dramatically reduced the risk of in-stent restenosis, stent thrombosis persists as an issue. Notwithstanding improvements in newer generation DES, they are yet to address the urgent clinical need to abolish the late stent complications that result from in-stent restenosis and are associated with late thrombus formation. These often lead to acute coronary syndromes with high mortality in coronary artery disease and acute limb ischemia with a high risk of limb amputation in peripheral arterial disease. Recently, a significant amount of research has focused on alternative solutions to improve stent biocompatibility by using tissue engineering. There are two types of tissue engineering endothelialisation methods: in vitro and in vivo. To date, commercially available in vivo endothelialised stents have failed to demonstrate antithrombotic or anti-stenosis efficacy in clinical trials. In contrast, the in vitro endothelialisation methods exhibit the advantage of monitoring cell type and growth prior to implantation, enabling better quality control. The present review discusses tissue-engineered candidate stents constructed by distinct in vitro endothelialisation approaches, with a particular focus on fabrication processes, including cell source selection, stent material composition, stent surface modifications, efficacy and safety evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies, and future directions.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisThrombosisHumansStentsEndothelial colony forming cellsEndovascular devicesGene-transferred cellsHuman trophoblastic endovascular progenitor cellsHuman umbilical vein endothelial cellsIn vitro endothelialisationMesenchymal stem cellsStent materialsStent surface modificationTissue-engineered stents

Identifiers

PMID34403073
OpenAlexW3194454980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.