Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34403054›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Integrated approach for the evaluation of groundwater quality through hydro geochemistry and human health risk from Shivganga river basin, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Ajaykumar Kadam, Vasant Wagh, James Jacobs, Sanjay Patil, Namdev Pawar, Bhavana Umrikar, Rabindranath Sankhua, Suyash Kumar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ajaykumar KadamDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Vasant WaghSchool of Earth Sciences, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, Nanded, Maharashtra, India. wagh.vasant@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1815-3625
James JacobsClearwater Group, 229 Tewksbury Avenue, Pt. Richmond, CA, 94801, USA.
Sanjay PatilDepartment of Applied Geology School of Environmental & Earth Sciences, KBC North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon, Maharashtra, 425 001, India.
Namdev PawarDr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, India.
Bhavana UmrikarDepartment of Geology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, 411007, India.
Rabindranath SankhuaBasin Planning, Central Water Commission, New Delhi, 110066, India.
Suyash KumarDepartment of Geology, Govt. P G Science College, Gwalior, 474009, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study is focused on seasonal variation in groundwater quality, hydrochemistry, and associated human health risk in the Shivganga river basin, Western Maharashtra, India, to promote sustainable development of groundwater resources of this semi-arid region. The qualitative geochemical analysis, contamination levels, and human health risk assessment (HHRA) of groundwater are integral steps in groundwater management in the Deccan Plateau basalt flow region of India. Representative groundwater samples (n = 68) collected from the Shivganga River basin area of Pune district, Maharashtra, during pre-monsoon (PRM) and post-monsoon (POM) seasons in 2015 were analyzed for major cations and anions. According to the World Health Organization (WHO, 2017) drinking standards, EC, total dissolved solids, hardness, bicarbonate, calcium, and magnesium surpassed the desirable limit. Boron and fluoride content exceeded the prescribed desirable limit of the WHO. The pollution and drinking suitability were assessed by computing pollution index of groundwater (PIG), groundwater quality index (GWQI), and HHRA particularly for boron and fluoride toxicity. PIG values inferred that about 6% of groundwater samples has moderate, 24% has low, and 70% has insignificant pollution in the PRM season, while only 1 sample (3%) showed high pollution, 6% showed low, and 91% showed insignificant pollution in the POM season. GWQI classification demonstrated that 27% and 15% samples are within the poor category, and only 15% and 18% of the samples fall into excellent water category in the PRM and the POM seasons, respectively. Total hazard index (THI) revealed that 88% of children, 59% of adults, and about 38% of infants are exposed to non-carcinogenic risk, as THI values (>1) were noted for the PRM season, while 62% of children, 47% of adults, and 24% of infants are vulnerable to non-carcinogenic health hazard during the POM period.

Indexed as

GroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringHumansIndiaRiversWater QualityWater Pollutants, ChemicalDrinking suitabilityGroundwater quality indexHuman health risk assessmentPollution index of groundwaterShivganga river

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.