ArticleMolecular biology reports2021
Taxonomy, not locality, influences the cloacal microbiota of two nearctic colubrids: a preliminary analysis.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Research Status and Prospect of Amphibian Symbiotic Microbiota.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Location Matters: Variations in Cloacal Microbiota Composition of Spatially Separated Freshwater Turtles.Microbial ecology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe gut microbiota is an emerging frontier in wildlife research and its importance to vertebrate health and physiology is becoming ever more apparent. Reptiles, in particular snakes, have not received the same attention given to other vertebrates and the composition of their wild gut microbiome remains understudied. The primary goal of this work was to describe the cloacal microbiota of two Colubrids, the Eastern Gartersnake (Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis) and the Northern Watersnake (Nerodia sipedon sipedon), and if their cloacal microbiota differed as well as if it did between a wetland and upland population of the former species. METHODS AND
resultsWe utilized next-generation sequencing of cloacal swabs-a non-destructive proxy for the gut microbiota. The cloacal microbiome of Eastern Gartersnakes (N = 9) was like those of other snakes being comprised of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes, while that of Northern Watersnakes (N = 6) was dominated by Tenericutes. Seven microbial operational taxonomic units (OTUs), all members of Proteobacteria, were shared among all individuals and were indicative of a core microbiome in Eastern Gartersnakes, but these OTUs were not particularly relevant to Northern Watersnakes. The latter had greater OTU richness than did Eastern Gartersnakes, and habitat did not have any apparent effect on the microbial community composition in Eastern Gartersnakes.
conclusionsOur findings suggest host taxonomy to be a determining factor in the cloacal microbiota of snakes and that Tenericutes are associated with aquatic habitats. This is the first report to examine the cloacal microbiome of these species and provides a useful foundation for future work to build upon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34403035What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.