ReviewDer Pathologe2021
[Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: subtypes and molecular pathology].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Histopathologic diagnosis of solid and cystic pancreatic lesions with a focus on ductal adenocarcinoma : A vademecum for daily practice].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ductal adenocarcinoma is the most common tumor of the pancreas. Although relatively rare, it poses one of the greatest oncological challenges because of its poor prognosis, which has so far only slightly improved. Progress has been made in the more precise classification and standardization of the morphological assessment. In the current WHO classification, prognostically relevant subtypes are clearly delimited among themselves and from ductal adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS). In the recent TNM classification, a size-based T‑category was introduced. Diagnostically, the histological assessment of the resection specimen is relatively easy; on the other hand, assessment of the fine-needle biopsy from the primary tumor or a liver metastasis is still difficult. The molecular stratification of ductal adenocarcinoma and the other pancreatic neoplasms has made great progress. This not only defined the genetics of tumor entities, but also identified the prognosis and biology of tumor groups on the basis of RNA expression patterns. The range of treatment could be expanded by targeted molecular therapies (especially for patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutations, NTRK- or NRG1-fusions, or oncogenic BRAF and PIK3CA mutations as well as tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI)), even if targeted therapies are currently only available for a minority of patients (<10%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
34402977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.