Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34402917›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2021

[Pathophysiology of bleeding].

Sirak Petros

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sirak PetrosInterdisziplinäre Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. sirak.petros@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
University Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bleeding is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. Anatomic and hemostatic causes play a central role in the pathophysiology of bleeding, with anatomic causes being by far more common. While trauma and invasive procedures are the leading causes of bleeding in surgical disciplines, gastrointestinal bleeding is the major cause of bleeding in internal medicine. Major bleedings lead to secondary homeostatic changes, which in turn not only contribute to further bleeding, but also to the pathogenesis of organ dysfunction. Acquired coagulopathies due to antithrombotic treatment or an underlying disease also contribute to the extent and the dynamics of bleeding, while hereditary bleeding disorders are seldom. The balance between the physiological pro- and anticoagulant pathway plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of bleeding and coagulation. Therefore, the pathophysiology of bleeding cannot be described by means of easily available laboratory coagulation workup. The aim of coagulation correction during the management of life-threatening bleeding is not to normalize coagulation, but rather to stop bleeding. Besides a careful clinical evaluation of the course of bleeding coupled with basic understanding of the physiology of coagulation, targeted laboratory coagulation workup can contribute to a rational coagulation treatment concept.

Indexed as

Blood Coagulation DisordersHemostaticsBlood CoagulationHemorrhageHemostasisHumansHemostaticsBlood coagulationBlood coagulation factorsFibrinVascular endotheliumWounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID34402917
OpenAlexW3194847706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.