ArticleJAMA network open2021
Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Endoscopic Screening for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer in High-Risk Areas in China.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Gastric Cancer Endoscopic Screening in Intermediate-Risk Countries-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Pooled it
- Economic Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Screening Strategies: A Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Profiles and Findings of Population-Based Esophageal Cancer Screening With Endoscopy in China: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Pooled it
- Optimal approach to prohibit drinking water prior to EGE in middle-aged and elderly individuals.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- Routine magnifying endoscopy mode improved the diagnostic efficacy of opportunistic screening for early upper gastrointestinal neoplasms: a prospective, randomized controlled study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- Large-scale esophageal cancer screening through noncontrast computed tomography and artificial intelligence.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- World Endoscopy Organization Position Statements for Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Direct economic burden of 0.9 million hospitalized cancer patients in Shenzhen, China, 2016-2022.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Elbasvir triggers ferroptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Article
- Optimizing the timing of painless gastroscope insertion: integrating advanced monitoring tools to enhance safety and efficacy: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Gastric cancer in China: Epidemiology, risk factors, and screening.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward esophageal cancer screening and early diagnosis and treatment among family members of esophageal cancer patients: A cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AI-based large-scale screening of gastric cancer from noncontrast CT imaging.Nature medicine · 2025Observational
- Orthodontic rubber band combined with magnetic ring as a traction device for improving endoscopic submucosal dissection training.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Gastric Cancer Screening in the United States: A Review of Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Cost Utility Analysis of National Cancer Screening Program for Gastric Cancer in Korea: A Markov Model Analysis.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Liquid biopsy to identify Barrett's oesophagus, dysplasia and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: theGut · 2025Article
- Assessing gastric cancer risk through longitudinal health check-up data: Insights from a national cohort study in South Korea.PloS one · 2025Article
- Translating evidence into action: overcoming barriers to gastric cancer prevention in Aotearoa.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Upper gastrointestinal tract cancer, including esophageal and gastric cancers, in China accounts for 50% of the global burden. Endoscopic screening may be associated with a decreased incidence of and mortality from upper gastrointestinal tract cancer. Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening for esophageal and gastric cancers among people aged 40 to 69 years in areas of China where the risk of these cancers is high. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this economic evaluation, a Markov model was constructed for initial screening at different ages from a health care system perspective, and 5 endoscopic screening strategies with different frequencies (once per lifetime and every 10 years, 5 years, 3 years, and 2 years) were evaluated. The study was conducted between January 1, 2019, and October 31, 2020. Model parameters were estimated based on this project, government documents, and published literature. For each initial screening age (40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, and 65-69 years), a closed cohort of 100 000 participants was assumed to enter the model and follow the alternative strategies. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cost-effectiveness was measured by calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and the willingness-to-pay threshold was assumed to be 3 times the per capita gross domestic product in China (US $10 276). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of model findings. Results: The study included a hypothetical cohort of 100 000 individuals aged 40 to 69 years. All 5 screening strategies were associated with improved effectiveness by 1087 to 10 362 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and increased costs by US $3 299 000 to $22 826 000 compared with no screening over a lifetime, leading to ICERs of US $1343 to $3035 per QALY. Screening at a higher frequency was associated with an increase in QALYs and costs; ICERs for higher frequency screening compared with the next-lower frequency screening were between US $1087 and $4511 per QALY. Screening every 2 years would be the most cost-effective strategy, with probabilities of 90% to 98% at 3 times the per capita gross domestic product of China. The model was the most sensitive to utility scores of esophageal cancer- or gastric cancer-related health states and compliance with screening. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that combined endoscopic screening for esophageal and gastric cancers may be cost-effective in areas of China where the risk of these cancers is high; screening every 2 years would be the optimal strategy. These data may be useful for development of policies targeting the prevention and control of upper gastrointestinal tract cancer in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.