Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34402798›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Association of Postoperative Clinical Outcomes With Sarcopenia, Frailty, and Nutritional Status in Older Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.

Nia Angharad Humphry, Thomas Wilson, Michael Christian Cox, Ben Carter, Marco Arkesteijn, Nicola Laura Reeves, Scott Brakenridge, Kathryn McCarthy, John Bunni, John Draper and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Nia Angharad HumphrySchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4837-1436
Thomas WilsonInstitute of Biological, Environmental & Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3112-4682
Michael Christian CoxDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4733-9023
Ben CarterDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0318-8865
Marco ArkesteijnInstitute of Biological, Environmental & Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-844X
Nicola Laura ReevesDepartment of Surgery, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3493-7390
Scott BrakenridgeDepartment of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-3718
Kathryn McCarthyNorth Bristol National Health Service Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3820-4917
John BunniRoyal United Hospitals Bath National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2251-9201
John DraperInstitute of Biological, Environmental & Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1446-6392
Jonathan HewittDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7924-1792
Aberystwyth University · GBCardiff University · GBNational Health Service · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J010308/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder patients account for a significant proportion of patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery and are vulnerable to a number of preoperative risk factors that are not often present in younger patients. Further, three preoperative risk factors that are more prevalent in older adults include frailty, sarcopenia, and malnutrition. Although each of these has been studied in isolation, there is little information on the interplay between them in older surgical patients. A particular area of increasing interest is the use of urine metabolomics for the objective evaluation of dietary profiles and malnutrition.

objectiveHerein, we describe the design, cohort, and standard operating procedures of a planned prospective study of older surgical patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection across multiple institutions in the United Kingdom. The objectives are to determine the association between clinical outcomes and frailty, nutritional status, and sarcopenia.

methodsThe procedures will include serial frailty evaluations (Clinical Frailty Scale and Groningen Frailty Indicator), functional assessments (hand grip strength and 4-meter walk test), muscle mass evaluations via computerized tomography morphometric analysis, and the evaluation of nutritional status via the analysis of urinary dietary biomarkers. The primary feasibility outcome is the estimation of the incidence rate of postoperative complications, and the primary clinical outcome is the association between the presence of postoperative complications and frailty, sarcopenia, and nutritional status. The secondary outcome measures are the length of hospital stay, 30-day hospital readmission rate, and mortality rate at days 30 and 90.

resultsOur study was approved by the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (reference number: 19/WA/0190) via the Integrated Research Application System (project ID: 231694) prior to subject recruitment. Cardiff University is acting as the study sponsor. Our study is financially supported through an external, peer-reviewed grant from the British Geriatrics Society and internal funding resources from Cardiff University. The results will be disseminated through peer-review publications, social media, and conference proceedings.

conclusionsAs frailty, sarcopenia, and malnutrition are all areas of common derangement in the older surgical population, prospectively studying these risk factors in concert will allow for the analysis of their interplay as well as the development of predictive models for those at risk of commonly tracked surgical complications and outcomes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/16846.

Indexed as

frailtygeriatric medicinenutritional statussarcopeniasurgeryurine metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID34402798
PMCPMC8408756
OpenAlexW3138550658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.