Observational studyRadiology2021
Right Ventricular Function at Cardiac MRI Predicts Cardiovascular Events in Patients with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.
Observational study in Radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond volumes and ejection fraction: practical insights into cine-CMR interpretation and applications.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Accelerated deep learning-based function assessment in cardiovascular magnetic resonance.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Prognosis and predictors of right ventricular dysfunction by quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2024Article
- MRI Assessment of Myocardial Deformation for Risk Stratification of Major Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Eligible for Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024Article
- Clinical Usefulness of Right Ventricle-Pulmonary Artery Coupling in Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance as an Etiological Diagnosis Tool in Recovered Sudden Cardiac Death or Unstable Ventricular Arrhythmia Patients.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2023Article
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction: An Ominous Sign.Radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) is an independent predictor of death and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with various cardiac conditions. Purpose To investigate whether RVEF, measured with cardiac MRI, is a predictor of appropriate shock or death in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Materials and Methods This retrospective, multicenter, observational study included patients who underwent cardiac MRI before ICD implantation between January 2007 and May 2017. Right ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and RVEF were measured with cardiac MRI. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or appropriate ICD shock. The secondary end point was all-cause mortality. The association between RVEF and primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated by using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Potential interactions were tested between primary prevention, ischemic cause, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and RVEF. Results Among 411 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 60 years; 315 men) during a median follow-up of 63 months, 143 (35%) patients experienced an appropriate ICD shock or died. In univariable analysis, lower RVEF was associated with greater risks for appropriate ICD shock or death and for death alone (log-rank trend test,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.