SynthesisThe Milbank quarterly2021
The Impact of Choosing Wisely Interventions on Low-Value Medical Services: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The Milbank quarterly, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness and mechanisms of interventions to reduce low-value thyroid function tests: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Interventions to improve the quality of low back pain care in emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Behavioural change interventions encouraging clinicians to reduce carbon emissions in clinical activity: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions to reduce low-value imaging - a systematic review of interventions and outcomes.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Deimplementation of inappropriate feeding practices in early care and education: a Hybrid Type 3 cluster-randomized trial.Implementation science : IS · 2026Trial
- Standardized Patient Communication and Low-Value Spinal Imaging: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Reducing Care Overuse in Older Patients Using Professional Norms and Accountability : A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2024Trial
- Effect of a Peer Comparison and Educational Intervention on Medical Test Conversation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Randomised trial of general practitioner online education for prescribing and test ordering.BMJ open quality · 2023Trial
- Randomized Trial of the Choosing Wisely Consumer Questions and a Shared Decision-Making Video Intervention on Decision-Making Outcomes.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023Trial
- Interruptive Electronic Alerts for Choosing Wisely Recommendations: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Trial
- WIse CHoices in the ICU (WICH-ICU): Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan for a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial of Choosing Wisely Interventions in Swedish Intensive Care Units.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Underdiagnosis of Health: A Key Driver of Overdiagnosis of Disease.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Article
- De-Implementing Low-Value Care in Dentistry: The Case for Choosing Wisely Campaigns.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026Article
- Protocol for optimizing the utilization rates of coronary angiography in Norway.Research in health services & regions · 2026Article
- From CXR to ultrasound: a multi-framework approach to advancing De-implementation in acute care.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Provider comments reveal barriers to EHR nudge effectiveness: process evaluation of a null deprescribing trial.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Commission on Cancer Quality Measure for Omission of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SNB) in Women Age 70 or Older with Hormone Receptor-Positive (HR+) Invasive Breast Cancer (IBC) Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS): Review of Historical Performance.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Reducing unwarranted variation in low-value health care in Norway: description of the NOR programme.Research in health services & regions · 2026Article
- Metrics used in quality improvement publications addressing environmental sustainability in healthcare: a scoping review.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Policy Points Dissemination of Choosing Wisely guidelines alone is unlikely to reduce the use of low-value health services. Interventions by health systems to implement Choosing Wisely guidelines can reduce the use of low-value services. Multicomponent interventions targeting clinicians are currently the most effective types of interventions. CONTEXT: Choosing Wisely aims to reduce the use of unnecessary, low-value medical services through development of recommendations related to service utilization. Despite the creation and dissemination of these recommendations, evidence shows low-value services are still prevalent. This paper synthesizes literature on interventions designed to reduce medical care identified as low value by Choosing Wisely and evaluates which intervention characteristics are most effective.
methodsWe searched peer-reviewed and gray literature from the inception of Choosing Wisely in 2012 through June 2019 to identify interventions in the United States motivated by or using Choosing Wisely recommendations. We also included studies measuring the impact of Choosing Wisely on its own, without interventions. We developed a coding guide and established coding agreement. We coded all included articles for types of services targeted, components of each intervention, results of the intervention, study type, and, where applicable, study quality. We measured the success rate of interventions, using chi-squared tests or Wald tests to compare across interventions.
findingsWe reviewed 131 articles. Eighty-eight percent of interventions focused on clinicians only; 48% included multiple components. Compared with dissemination of Choosing Wisely recommendations only, active interventions were more likely to generate intended results (65% vs 13%, p < 0.001) and, among those, interventions with multiple components were more successful than those with one component (77% vs 47%, p = 0.002). The type of services targeted did not matter for success. Clinician-based interventions were more effective than consumer-based, though there is a dearth of studies on consumer-based interventions. Only 17% of studies included a control arm.
conclusionsInterventions built on the Choosing Wisely recommendations can be effective at changing practice patterns to reduce the use of low-value care. Interventions are more effective when targeting clinicians and using more than one component. There is a need for high-quality studies that include active controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.