Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34402131›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Hormone Receptor Subtype in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Prognostic and Predictive Roles of the Progesterone Receptor.

Ki-Tae Hwang, Young Jin Suh, Chan-Heun Park, Young Joo Lee, Jee Ye Kim, Jin Hyang Jung, Seeyeong Kim, Junwon Min, Korean Breast Cancer Society

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ki-Tae HwangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6597-3119
Young Jin SuhDepartment of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chan-Heun ParkDepartment of Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Joo LeeDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jee Ye KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Hyang JungDepartment of Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Seeyeong KimDepartment of Surgery, SaeGyaeRo Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Junwon MinDepartment of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Korean Breast Cancer Society
Asan Medical Center · KRBumin Hospital Group · KRDankook University · KRKyungpook National University · KRSeoul National University · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRThe Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe investigated the prognostic and predictive roles of the hormone receptor (HRc) subtype in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We focused on identifying the roles of the progesterone receptor (PR) independent of estrogen receptor (ER) status.

methodsNationwide data of 12,508 female patients diagnosed with DCIS with a mean follow-up period of 60.7 months were analyzed. HRc subtypes were classified as ER-/PR-, ER-/PR+, ER+/PR-, and ER+/PR+ based on ER and PR statuses. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsThe ER+/PR+ group showed better prognoses than the ER+/PR- and ER-/PR- groups in the patients who received tamoxifen therapy (p = .001 and p = .031, respectively). HRc subtype was an independent prognostic factor (p = .028). The tamoxifen therapy group showed better survival than the patients who did not receive tamoxifen, but only in the ER+/PR+ subgroup (p = .002). Tamoxifen therapy was an independent prognostic factor (HR, 0.619; 95% CI, 0.423 - 0.907; p = .014). PR status was a favorable prognostic factor in patients with DCIS who received tamoxifen therapy (p < .001), and it remained a prognostic factor independent of ER status (HR, 0.576; 95% CI, 0.349 - 0.951; p = .031).

conclusionThe HRc subtype can be used as both a prognostic and predictive marker in patients with newly diagnosed DCIS. Tamoxifen therapy can improve overall survival in the ER+/PR+ subtype. PR status has significant prognostic and predictive roles independent of ER status. Testing for the PR status in addition to the ER status is routinely recommended in patients with DCIS to determine the HRc subtype in clinical settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The hormone receptor (HRc) subtype was an independent prognostic factor, and the estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR) + subtype showed a better survival in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who received tamoxifen therapy. PR was an independent prognostic factor independent of ER, and PR was a favorable prognostic factor in patients with DCIS who received tamoxifen therapy. The HRc subtype could be used as both a prognostic and predictive marker in patients with newly diagnosed DCIS. Testing of PR status in addition to ER status is routinely recommended for patients with DCIS to determine the HRc subtype in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingReceptors, ProgesteroneFemaleHormonesHumansPrognosisHormonesReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast neoplasmsDuctal carcinoma in situEstrogen receptorHormone receptor subtypeProgesterone receptor

Identifiers

PMID34402131
PMCPMC8571738
OpenAlexW3194064485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.