Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34401670›Full record

ArticleiScience2021

LiquidCNA: Tracking subclonal evolution from longitudinal liquid biopsies using somatic copy number alterations.

Eszter Lakatos, Helen Hockings, Maximilian Mossner, Weini Huang, Michelle Lockley, Trevor A Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Adaptive Cancer Therapy in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
  10. Adaptive Control of Tumor Growth.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eszter LakatosCentre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Helen HockingsCentre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Maximilian MossnerCentre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Weini HuangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Michelle LockleyCentre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Trevor A GrahamCentre for Genomics and Computational Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

The Role of the Microbiome in Cancer Suppression and Susceptibility Across SpeciesU54CA217376 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MALEY, CARLO · 2018 to 2022
$8.6M
Cancer Research UK 19694Cancer Research UK 19771Cancer Research UK A19771NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217376Wellcome Trust 202778/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) measured via liquid biopsies provides a way for minimally invasive monitoring of tumor evolutionary dynamics during therapy. Here we present liquidCNA, a method to track subclonal evolution from longitudinally collected cfDNA samples sequenced through cost-effective low-pass whole-genome sequencing. LiquidCNA utilizes somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) to simultaneously genotype and quantify the size of the dominant subclone without requiring B-allele frequency information, matched-normal samples, or prior knowledge on the genetic identity of the emerging clone. We demonstrate the accuracy of liquidCNA in synthetically generated sample sets and

Indexed as

CancerCancer systems biologyGenomics

Identifiers

PMID34401670
PMCPMC8350516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.