Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34401562›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2021

Ground improvement using chemical methods: A review.

Harshal Verma, Arunava Ray, Rajesh Rai, Tushar Gupta, Neeraj Mehta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harshal VermaDepartment of Mining Engineering, IIT(BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221005, India.
Arunava RayDepartment of Mining Engineering, IIT(BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221005, India.
Rajesh RaiDepartment of Mining Engineering, IIT(BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221005, India.
Tushar GuptaDepartment of Mining Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Odisha 769001, India.
Neeraj MehtaDepartment of Physics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221005, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ground improvement will be critically important in the present and future geotechnical practice for designing the structures in weak soil. This paper presents a review of the recent development in ground improvement techniques, especially chemical stabilisers. Various available chemical stabilisers are identified and compared with other available methods. Though the use of chemicals provides an excellent alternative to the traditional methods, they still lack proper understanding regarding their use, handling, application, and long-term effect on the environment. Various chemical stabilisers and their applicability conditions are summarised in the present paper. Insight of biochemical, electrochemical, inorganic, and organic stabilisers is presented with future scope of these methods along with the potential areas where a lot of efforts is needed to industrialise these methods are also discussed briefly. A need for developing a more environmentally friendly and safe method was felt while reviewing these methods. Lack of a large amount of data is a major concern for lesser use of these methods industrially. A lot of laboratory and field experiments should be conducted in different conditions to ensure safe results from chemical stabilisers.

Indexed as

Biochemical stabilisersChemical stabilisersElectrochemical stabilisersGround improvementInorganic and organic stabilisers

Identifiers

PMID34401562
PMCPMC8353306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.