ArticleTrauma case reports2021
Identification of a small pericardial effusion on contrast-enhanced computed tomography indicating cardiac perforation and pericardial injury following blunt trauma: A case report.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blunt trauma may cause cardiac perforation requiring emergency surgical repair. Cardiac perforations are usually diagnosed by the presence of a pericardial effusion on echocardiography. However, cardiac perforations and pericardial effusions are sometimes too small to detect, resulting in underdiagnosis. In this case report, we describe a 22-year-old man who was involved in a traffic accident, admitted in a state of shock, and was initially treated for tension pneumothorax and liver and spleen injuries. His initial computed tomography scans revealed a small region of enhancement, corresponding to a small pericardial effusion, indicative of a cardiac perforation. Thus, an emergency median sternotomy was performed. He was diagnosed with perforation of the left atrial ear and right atrium, which were repaired surgically. His liver and spleen injuries were also treated, and the patient was discharged 44 days after admission. The detection of a small pericardial effusion on enhanced computed tomography enabled rapid diagnosis of a cardiac perforation and ensured emergency surgical repair could be performed as soon as possible. LEARNING
objectives•To acknowledge the difficulty of diagnosing cardiac perforation in patients with pericardial injury, based on conventional signs of blunt cardiac injury, such as sternal fracture, serum cardiac enzymes, and hemothorax.•To recognize that a small pericardial effusion on enhanced computed tomography scans is an important finding that should raise suspicion of cardiac perforation and pericardial injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.