Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34401370›Full record

ReviewInternet interventions2021

Engagement with online psychosocial interventions for psychosis: A review and synthesis of relevant factors.

Chelsea Arnold, John Farhall, Kristi-Ann Villagonzalo, Kriti Sharma, Neil Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Internet interventions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Online Health Information-Seeking Behaviours and eHealth Literacy among First-Generation Chinese Immigrants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea ArnoldCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
John FarhallDepartment of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Kristi-Ann VillagonzaloCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Kriti SharmaCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Neil ThomasCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Swinburne University of Technology · AUMelbourne Health · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about factors associated with engagement with online interventions for psychosis. This review aimed to synthesise existing data from relevant literature to develop a working model of potential variables that may impact on engagement with online interventions for psychosis.

methodsOnline databases were searched for studies relevant to predictors of engagement with online interventions for psychosis; predictors of Internet use amongst individuals with psychosis; and predictors of engagement with traditional psychosocial treatments for psychosis. Data were synthesised into a conceptual model highlighting factors relevant to engagement with online interventions for psychosis.

resultsSixty-one studies were identified. Factors relevant to engagement related directly to the impact of psychosis, response to psychosis, integration of technology into daily lives and intervention aspects.

conclusionWhile several candidate predictors were identified, there is minimal research specifically investigated predictors of engagement with online interventions for psychosis. Further investigation examining both individual- and intervention-related factors is required to inform effective design and dissemination of online interventions for psychosis.

Indexed as

CBT, cognitive behavioural therapyCBTp, cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosisDigital mental healtheHealthEMA, ecological momentary assessmentEngagementFEP, first-episode psychosisInterventionPsychosis

Identifiers

PMID34401370
PMCPMC8350605
OpenAlexW3167519498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.