Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34400825›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2021

Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.

Emily Nicholson, Kate E Watermeyer, Jessica A Rowland, Chloe F Sato, Simone L Stevenson, Angela Andrade, Thomas M Brooks, Neil D Burgess, Su-Ting Cheng, Hedley S Grantham and 10 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 11 countries.

Emily NicholsonCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia. e.nicholson@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2199-3446
Kate E WatermeyerCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica A RowlandCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-681X
Chloe F SatoCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7707-5068
Simone L StevensonCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9807-9807
Angela AndradeIUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Gland, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0075-6169
Thomas M BrooksIUCN, Gland, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8159-3116
Neil D BurgessUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, UK.
Su-Ting ChengSchool of Forestry & Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1786-6049
Hedley S GranthamWildlife Conservation Society, Global Conservation Program, New York, NY, USA.
Samantha L HillUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0565-6554
David A KeithIUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Gland, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7627-4150
Martine MaronCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-5789
Daniel MetzkePotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam, Germany.
Nicholas J MurrayCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4008-3053
Cara R NelsonIUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Gland, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-0859
David OburaCORDIO East Africa, Mombasa, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2256-6649
Andy PlumptreKey Biodiversity Area Secretariat, BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9333-4047
Andrew L SkownoSouth African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2726-7886
James E M WatsonCentre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1984
Deakin University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUBirdLife international · GBCoastal Oceans Research and Development in the Indian Ocean · KECorporación Internacional para el Desarrollo Educativo · COInternational Union for Conservation of Nature · CHJames Cook University · AUNational Taiwan University · TWNSW Department of Planning and Environment · AUPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research · DEUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of the Philippines Los Baños · PHWildlife Conservation Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite substantial conservation efforts, the loss of ecosystems continues globally, along with related declines in species and nature's contributions to people. An effective ecosystem goal, supported by clear milestones, targets and indicators, is urgently needed for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework and beyond to support biodiversity conservation, the UN Sustainable Development Goals and efforts to abate climate change. Here, we describe the scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal and milestones, founded on a theory of change, and review available indicators to measure progress. An ecosystem goal should include three core components: area, integrity and risk of collapse. Targets-the actions that are necessary for the goals to be met-should address the pathways to ecosystem loss and recovery, including safeguarding remnants of threatened ecosystems, restoring their area and integrity to reduce risk of collapse and retaining intact areas. Multiple indicators are needed to capture the different dimensions of ecosystem area, integrity and risk of collapse across all ecosystem types, and should be selected for their fitness for purpose and relevance to goal components. Science-based goals, supported by well-formulated action targets and fit-for-purpose indicators, will provide the best foundation for reversing biodiversity loss and sustaining human well-being.

Indexed as

EcosystemGoalsBiodiversityClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesHumans

Identifiers

PMID34400825
OpenAlexW3194117224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.