Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34400819›Full record

ArticleHeredity2021

Long-term exhaustion of the inbreeding load in Drosophila melanogaster.

Noelia Pérez-Pereira, Ramón Pouso, Ana Rus, Ana Vilas, Eugenio López-Cortegano, Aurora García-Dorado, Humberto Quesada, Armando Caballero

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Increased incidences of cervical ribs in deer indicate extinction risk.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Noelia Pérez-PereiraCentro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Facultade de Bioloxía, Vigo, Spain. noeperez@uvigo.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4731-3712
Ramón PousoCentro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Facultade de Bioloxía, Vigo, Spain.
Ana RusCentro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Facultade de Bioloxía, Vigo, Spain.
Ana VilasCentro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Facultade de Bioloxía, Vigo, Spain.
Eugenio López-CorteganoCentro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Facultade de Bioloxía, Vigo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6914-6305
Aurora García-DoradoFacultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Departamento de Genética, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Humberto QuesadaCentro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Facultade de Bioloxía, Vigo, Spain.
Armando CaballeroCentro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, Facultade de Bioloxía, Vigo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-6974
Universidade de Vigo · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inbreeding depression, the decline in fitness of inbred individuals, is a ubiquitous phenomenon of great relevance in evolutionary biology and in the fields of animal and plant breeding and conservation. Inbreeding depression is due to the expression of recessive deleterious alleles that are concealed in heterozygous state in noninbred individuals, the so-called inbreeding load. Genetic purging reduces inbreeding depression by removing these alleles when expressed in homozygosis due to inbreeding. It is generally thought that fast inbreeding (such as that generated by full-sib mating lines) removes only highly deleterious recessive alleles, while slow inbreeding can also remove mildly deleterious ones. However, a question remains regarding which proportion of the inbreeding load can be removed by purging under slow inbreeding in moderately large populations. We report results of two long-term slow inbreeding Drosophila experiments (125-234 generations), each using a large population and a number of derived lines with effective sizes about 1000 and 50, respectively. The inbreeding load was virtually exhausted after more than one hundred generations in large populations and between a few tens and over one hundred generations in the lines. This result is not expected from genetic drift alone, and is in agreement with the theoretical purging predictions. Computer simulations suggest that these results are consistent with a model of relatively few deleterious mutations of large homozygous effects and partially recessive gene action.

Indexed as

InbreedingInbreeding DepressionAllelesAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID34400819
PMCPMC8478893
OpenAlexW3195162218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.