Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34400815›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2022

Increased and biased deliberation in social anxiety.

Lindsay E Hunter, Elana A Meer, Claire M Gillan, Ming Hsu, Nathaniel D Daw

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prioritizing replay when future goals are unknown.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lindsay E HunterDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. lehunter@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3022-3515
Elana A MeerPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1100-4923
Claire M GillanSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Ming HsuHaas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7195-3579
Nathaniel D DawDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. ndaw@princeton.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5029-1430
Princeton University · USTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Dopaminergic Mechanisms Underlying Human Social Behavior: A Multimodal ApproachR01MH112775 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HSU, MING, KAYSER, ANDREW S · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Differentiating reward seeking and loss avoidance with reference-dependent learning modelsR01MH121093 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI DAW, NATHANIEL DOUGLASS, SHOHAMY, DAPHNA · 2019 to 2022
$2.1M
Neurobiological Substrates of Social Behavior: A Neuroeconomic FrameworkR01MH098023 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HSU, MING · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
CRCNS: Neurocomputational substrates of monetary exchangeR01DA043196 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HSU, MING · 2016 to 2018
$474k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043196NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098023NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112775NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A goal of computational psychiatry is to ground symptoms in basic mechanisms. Theory suggests that avoidance in anxiety disorders may reflect dysregulated mental simulation, a process for evaluating candidate actions. If so, these covert processes should have observable consequences: choices reflecting increased and biased deliberation. In two online general population samples, we examined how self-report symptoms of social anxiety disorder predict choices in a socially framed reinforcement learning task, the patent race, in which the pattern of choices reflects the content of deliberation. Using a computational model to assess learning strategy, we found that self-report social anxiety was indeed associated with increased deliberative evaluation. This effect was stronger for a particular subset of feedback ('upward counterfactual') in one of the experiments, broadly matching the biased content of rumination in social anxiety disorder, and robust to controlling for other psychiatric symptoms. These results suggest a grounding of symptoms of social anxiety disorder in more basic neuro-computational mechanisms.

Indexed as

AdultAnxietyFemaleGames, ExperimentalHumansJudgmentMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34400815
PMCPMC9849449
OpenAlexW3193491860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.