Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34400713›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Indoor and outdoor noise changes due to the COVID-19 lockdown and their effects on individuals' expectations and preferences.

Marco Caniato, Federica Bettarello, Andrea Gasparella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sons al Balcó: A Comparative Analysis of WASN-BasedSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Remote work: Aircraft noise implications, prediction, and management in the built environment.Applied acoustics. Acoustique applique. Angewandte Akustik · 2022
    Review
  10. Exploring Health Trends Prior to State Pension Age for The Netherlands up to 2040.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marco CaniatoFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bozen, Italy. mcaniato@unibz.it.
Federica BettarelloDepartment of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Andrea GasparellaFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bozen, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly modified our urban territories. One of the most strongly affected parameters was outdoor noise, caused by traffic and human activity in general, all of which were forced to stop during the spring of 2020. This caused an indubitable noise reduction both inside and outside the home. This study investigates how people reacted to this new unexpected, unwanted and unpredictable situation. Using field measurements, it was possible to demonstrate how the outdoor sound pressure level clearly decreased. Furthermore, by means of an international survey, it was discovered that people had positive reaction to the lower noise level. This preference was generally not related to home typology or location in the city, but rather to a generalized wish to live in a quieter urban environment.

Indexed as

NoisePersonal SatisfactionAdultCitiesCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Environmental MonitoringFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsResidence CharacteristicsSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban Health

Identifiers

PMID34400713
PMCPMC8368209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.