Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34400658›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Synthesis, characterisation and thermo-physical properties of highly stable graphene oxide-based aqueous nanofluids for potential low-temperature direct absorption solar applications.

Wisut Cham Sa-Ard, Derek Fawcett, Chun Che Fung, Peter Chapman, Supriya Rattan, Gerrard Eddy Jai Poinern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nanobio Interface Between Proteins and 2D Nanomaterials.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wisut Cham Sa-ArdMurdoch Applied Innovation Nanotechnology Research Group, Department of Physics, Energy Studies and Nanotechnology, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Derek FawcettMurdoch Applied Innovation Nanotechnology Research Group, Department of Physics, Energy Studies and Nanotechnology, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Chun Che FungSchool of Engineering and Energy, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Peter ChapmanSchool of Molecular and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.
Supriya RattanMurdoch Applied Innovation Nanotechnology Research Group, Department of Physics, Energy Studies and Nanotechnology, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Gerrard Eddy Jai PoinernMurdoch Applied Innovation Nanotechnology Research Group, Department of Physics, Energy Studies and Nanotechnology, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia. g.poinern@murdoch.edu.au.
Murdoch University · AUCurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two types of highly stable 0.1% graphene oxide-based aqueous nanofluids were synthesised and investigated. The first nanofluid (GO) was prepared under the influence of ultrasonic irradiation without surfactant. The second nanofluid was treated with tetra ethyl ammonium hydroxide to reduce the graphene oxide to form reduced graphene oxide (RGO) during ultrasonic irradiation. The GO and RGO powders were characterised by various techniques such as field emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction and Raman. Also UV-visible absorption spectroscopy was carried out and band gap energies were determined. Optical band gap energies for indirect transitions ranged from 3.4 to 4.4 eV and for direct transitions they ranged between 2.2 and 3.7 eV. Thermal conductivity measurements of the GO-based aqueous nanofluid revealed an enhancement of 9.5% at 40 °C compared to pure water, while the RGO-based aqueous nanofluid at 40 °C had a value 9.23% lower than pure water. Furthermore, the photothermal response of the RGO-based aqueous nanofluid had a temperature increase of 13.5 °C, (enhancement of 60.2%) compared to pure water, the GO-based aqueous nanofluid only displayed a temperature rise of 10.9 °C, (enhancement of 46.6%) after 20 min exposure to a solar irradiance of 1000 W m

Identifiers

PMID34400658
PMCPMC8367989
OpenAlexW3193761577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.