Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34400500›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Economic impacts of tipping points in the climate system.

Simon Dietz, James Rising, Thomas Stoerk, Gernot Wagner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
43.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 175 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Do early warning signals of tipping points lead to better decisions?Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  6. Weakening AMOC reduces ocean carbon uptake and increases the social cost of carbon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Synthesis of evidence yields high social cost of carbon due to structural model variation and uncertainties.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Policies, projections, and the social cost of carbon: Results from the DICE-2023 model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The social costs of tropical cyclones.Nature communications · 2023
    Article
  16. Opportunities for synthetic data in nature and climate finance.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon DietzDepartment of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom; s.dietz@lse.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5002-018X
James RisingCollege of Earth, Ocean and Environment, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716.ORCID 0000-0001-8514-4748
Thomas StoerkGrantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom.
Gernot WagnerDepartment of Environmental Studies and Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY 10003.ORCID 0000-0001-6059-0688
London School of Economics and Political Science · GBUniversity of Delaware · USWagner College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate scientists have long emphasized the importance of climate tipping points like thawing permafrost, ice sheet disintegration, and changes in atmospheric circulation. Yet, save for a few fragmented studies, climate economics has either ignored them or represented them in highly stylized ways. We provide unified estimates of the economic impacts of all eight climate tipping points covered in the economic literature so far using a meta-analytic integrated assessment model (IAM) with a modular structure. The model includes national-level climate damages from rising temperatures and sea levels for 180 countries, calibrated on detailed econometric evidence and simulation modeling. Collectively, climate tipping points increase the social cost of carbon (SCC) by ∼25% in our main specification. The distribution is positively skewed, however. We estimate an ∼10% chance of climate tipping points more than doubling the SCC. Accordingly, climate tipping points increase global economic risk. A spatial analysis shows that they increase economic losses almost everywhere. The tipping points with the largest effects are dissociation of ocean methane hydrates and thawing permafrost. Most of our numbers are probable underestimates, given that some tipping points, tipping point interactions, and impact channels have not been covered in the literature so far; however, our method of structural meta-analysis means that future modeling of climate tipping points can be integrated with relative ease, and we present a reduced-form tipping points damage function that could be incorporated in other IAMs.

Indexed as

climate riskclimate tipping pointsintegrated assessment modelsocial cost of carbon

Identifiers

PMID34400500
PMCPMC8403967
OpenAlexW3193938646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.