Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34400454›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Comparison of a preventive or curative strategy of fluid removal on the weaning of mechanical ventilation: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised open-label parallel-group trial.

Martin Dres, Candice Estellat, Jean-Luc Baudel, François Beloncle, Julien Cousty, Arnaud Galbois, Laurent Guérin, Vincent Labbe, Guylaine Labro, Jordane Lebut and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04050007 (Effect of a Systematic Preventive Versus Curative Strategy of Fluid Removal on the Weaning of Mechanical Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04050007 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effect of a Systematic Preventive Versus Curative Strategy of Fluid Removal on the Weaning of Mechanical Ventilation

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2020 to 2024Enrolled410ConditionsRespiratory InsufficiencyArmsPreventive initiation of fluid removal, Curative initiation of fluid removal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stepwise fluid management in critical illness.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin DresService de Médecine intensive Réanimation, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitie Salpêtriere, Paris, France martin.dres@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9191-6089
Candice EstellatDépartement de Santé Publique, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Jean-Luc BaudelService de Médecine intensive Réanimation, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
François BeloncleService de Médecine intensive Réanimation et médedine hyperbare, CHU Angers, Angers, Pays de la Loire, France.
Julien CoustyService de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHU de La Réunion Sites Sud Saint-Pierre, Saint-Pierre, Réunion.
Arnaud GalboisService de Réanimation polyvalente, Hôpital Claude Galien, Quincy-sous-Senart, France.
Laurent GuérinService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France.
Vincent LabbeService de Réanimation et USC Médico-Chirurgicale, APHP.Sorbonne University, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
Guylaine LabroService de Réanimation médicale, Centre Hospitalier de Mulhouse, Mulhouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2578-3422
Jordane LebutService de Réanimation et Surveillance Continue, Groupement Hospitalier Nord Essonne, Longjumeau, Île-de-France, France.
Jean-Paul MiraService de Médecine intensive Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Centre-Hôpital Cochin, Paris, Île-de-France, France.
Gwenael PratService de Médecine intensive et Réanimation, CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
Jean-Pierre QuenotService de Médecine intensive Réanimation, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2351-682X
Armand DessapService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, APHP. Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Creteil, France.
Reseau Européen de Recherche en Ventilation Artificielle (REVA) research network
Sorbonne Université · FRBicêtre Hospital · FRCentre Hospitalier de Mulhouse · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion · FRCHU Dijon Bourgogne · FRHôpital Clinique Claude-Bernard · FRHôpital Cochin · FRHôpital Nord · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFluid overload is associated with a poor prognosis in the critically ill patients, especially at the time of weaning from mechanical ventilation as it may promote weaning failure from cardiac origin. Some data suggest that early administration of diuretics would shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation. However, this strategy may expose patients to a higher risk of haemodynamic and metabolic complications. Currently, there is no recommendation for the use of diuretics during weaning and there is an equipoise on the timing of their initiation in this context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing two strategies of fluid removal during weaning in 13 French intensive care units (ICU). The preventive strategy is initiated systematically when the fluid balance or weight change is positive and the patients have criteria for clinical stability; the curative strategy is initiated only in case of weaning failure documented as of cardiac origin. Four hundred and ten patients will be randomised with a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation, defined as the number of days between randomisation and successful extubation (alive without reintubation nor tracheostomy within the 7 days after extubation) at day 28. Secondary outcomes include daily and cumulated fluid balance, metabolic and haemodynamic complications, ventilator-associated pneumonia, weaning complications, number of ventilator-free days, total duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of stay in ICU and mortality in ICU, in hospital and, at day 28. A subgroup analysis for the primary outcome is planned in patients with kidney injury (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes class 2 or more) at the time of randomisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Paris 1) and patients will be included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04050007. PROTOCOL VERSION: V.1; 12 March 2019.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationRespiration, ArtificialCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVentilators, Mechanicaladult cardiologyadult intensive & critical carerespiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine)

Identifiers

PMID34400454
PMCPMC8370501
OpenAlexW3194468443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.