Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34400444›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Improving professional health literacy in hospitals: study protocol of a participatory codesign and implementation study.

Johanna Sophie Lubasch, Mona Voigt-Barbarowicz, Sonia Lippke, Rudy Leon De Wilde, Frank Griesinger, Djordje Lazovic, Paloma Citlálli Ocampo Villegas, Julia Roeper, Daniela Salzmann, Gesine H Seeber and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perspectives on Big Data and Big Data Analytics in Healthcare.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2024
    Article
  6. Organizational Health Literacy in a Hospital-Insights on the Patients' Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna Sophie Lubasch *Division for Organizational Health Services Research, Department of Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-1816
Mona Voigt-Barbarowicz *Junior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany mona.voigt-barbarowicz@uni-oldenburg.de.
Sonia LippkeDepartment of Psychology & Methods, Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen, Germany.
Rudy Leon De WildeUniversity Hospital for Gynaecology, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5759-9745
Frank GriesingerUniversity Hospital for Haematology and Oncology, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Djordje LazovicUniversity Hospital of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Pius-Hospital, Medical Campus University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Paloma Citlálli Ocampo VillegasDepartment of Psychology & Methods, Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH, Bremen, Germany.
Julia RoeperUniversity Hospital for Haematology and Oncology, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Daniela SalzmannUniversity Hospital for Visceral Surgery, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Gesine H SeeberUniversity Hospital of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Pius-Hospital, Medical Campus University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Luz-Angela Torres-de-la-RocheUniversity Hospital for Gynaecology, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Dirk WeyheUniversity Hospital for Visceral Surgery, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Lena Ansmann *Division for Organizational Health Services Research, Department of Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Anna Levke Brütt *Junior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Pius Hospital Oldenburg · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEConstructor University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn connection with a hospital stay, patients have to make important health-related decisions. They need to find, understand, assess and apply health-related information, and therefore, require health literacy. Adequately responding to the needs of patients requires promoting the communication skills of healthcare professionals within healthcare organisations. Health-literate healthcare organisations can provide an environment strengthening professionals' and patients' health literacy. When developing health-literate healthcare organisations, it has to be considered that implementing organisational change is typically challenging. In this study, a communication concept based on previously evaluated communication training is codesigned, implemented and evaluated in four clinical departments of a university hospital. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: In a codesign phase, focus group interviews among employees and patients as well as a workshop series with employees and hospital management are used to tailor the communication concept to the clinical departments and to patients' needs. Also, representatives responsible for the topic of health literacy are established among employees. The communication concept is implemented over a 12-month period; outcomes studied are health literacy on the organisational and patient levels. Longitudinal survey data acquired from a control cohort prior to the implementation phase are compared with data of an intervention cohort after the implementation phase. Moreover, survey data from healthcare professionals before and after the implementation are compared. For formative evaluation, healthcare professionals are interviewed in focus groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Oldenburg and is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Study participants are asked to provide written informed consent. The results are disseminated via direct communication within the hospital, publications and conference presentations. If the intervention turns out to be successful, the intervention and implementation strategies will be made available to other hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00019830.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyCommunicationHealth PersonnelHospitals, UniversityHumansInformed Consentmedical education & trainingorganisational developmentorganisation of health services

Identifiers

PMID34400444
PMCPMC8370497
OpenAlexW3193543952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.