Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34400272›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of cardiology2021

Predicting Incident Heart Failure in Women With Machine Learning: The Women's Health Initiative Cohort.

Geoffrey H Tison, Robert Avram, Gregory Nah, Liviu Klein, Barbara V Howard, Matthew A Allison, Ramon Casanova, Rachael H Blair, Khadijah Breathett, Randi E Foraker and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AI's ongoing impact: Implications of AI's effects on health equity for women's healthcare providers.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffrey H TisonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. Electronic address: Geoff.tison@ucsf.edu.
Robert AvramDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Gregory NahDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Liviu KleinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Barbara V HowardMedstar Health Research Institute and Georgetown/Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Washington DC, USA.
Matthew A AllisonDivision of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Ramon CasanovaWake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Rachael H BlairState University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Khadijah BreathettDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson Arizona, USA.
Randi E ForakerWashington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jeffrey E OlginDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Nisha I ParikhDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USGeorgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California San Diego · USWake Forest University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Dynamic prediction of heart failure using real-time functional status and EHR data in the ambulatory settingK23HL135274 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI TISON, GEOFFREY H · 2018 to 2022
$999k
Addressing Individual Provider Bias and Group Decision-Making in Selection of Advanced Heart Failure Therapies in Racial/Ethnic MinoritiesK01HL142848 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BREATHETT, KHADIJAH · 2018 to 2021
$858k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL142848NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL135274NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL148881NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201700002C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure (HF) is a leading cause of cardiac morbidity among women, whose risk factors differ from those in men. We used machine-learning approaches to develop risk- prediction models for incident HF in a cohort of postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI).

methodsWe used 2 machine-learning methods-Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and Classification and Regression Trees (CART)-to perform variable selection on 1227 baseline WHI variables for the primary outcome of incident HF. These variables were then used to construct separate Cox proportional hazard models, and we compared these results, using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, against a comparator model built using variables from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) HF prediction model. We analyzed 43,709 women who had 2222 incident HF events; median follow-up was 14.3 years.

resultsLASSO selected 10 predictors, and CART selected 11 predictors. The highest correlation between selected variables was 0.46. In addition to selecting well-established predictors such as age, myocardial infarction, and smoking, novel predictors included physical function, number of pregnancies, number of previous live births and age at menopause. In ROC analysis, the CART-derived model had the highest C-statistic of 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.85), followed by LASSO 0.82 (95% CI, 0.81-0.84) and ARIC 0.73 (95% CI, 0.70-0.76).

conclusionsMachine-learning approaches can be used to develop HF risk-prediction models that can have better discrimination compared with an established HF risk model and may provide a basis for investigating novel HF predictors.

Indexed as

ForecastingMachine LearningWomen's HealthAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart FailureHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34400272
PMCPMC8642266
OpenAlexW3192000298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.