Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34400267›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021

Dosimetric Uncertainties Resulting From Interfractional Anatomic Variations for Patients Receiving Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Guidance.

Joshua S Niedzielski, Yufei Liu, Sylvia S W Ng, Rachael M Martin, Luis A Perles, Sam Beddar, Neal Rebueno, Eugene J Koay, Cullen Taniguchi, Emma B Holliday and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua S NiedzielskiDepartment of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center. Electronic address: JSNiedzielski@mdanderson.org.
Yufei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Sylvia S W NgDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Rachael M MartinDepartment of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Luis A PerlesDepartment of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Sam BeddarDepartment of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Neal RebuenoDepartment of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Eugene J KoayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Cullen TaniguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Emma B HollidayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Prajnan DasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Grace L SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Bruce D MinskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Ethan B LudmirDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Joseph M HermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Albert KoongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Gabriel O SawakuchiDepartment of Radiation Physics, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: gsawakuchi@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo estimate the effects of interfractional anatomic changes on dose to organs at risk (OARs) and tumors, as measured with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance for pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated 11 patients with pancreatic cancer whom were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (33-40 Gy in 5 fractions) using daily CT-on-rails (CTOR) image guidance immediately before treatment with breath-hold motion management. CBCT alignment was simulated in the treatment planning software by aligning the original planning CT to each fractional CTOR image set via fiducial markers. CTOR data sets were used to calculate fractional doses after alignment by applying the rigid shift of the planning CT and CTOR image sets to the planning treatment isocenter and recalculating the fractional dose. Accumulated dose to the gross tumor volume (GTV), tumor vessel interface, duodenum, small bowel, and stomach were calculated by summing the 5 fractional absolute dose-volume histograms into a single dose-volume histogram for comparison with the original planned dose.

resultsFour patients had a GTV D100% of at least 1.5 Gy less than the fractional planned value in several fractions; 4 patients had fractional underestimation of duodenum dose by 1.0 Gy per fraction. The D1.0 cm

conclusionsFor some patients, CBCT image guidance based on fiducial alignment may cause large dosimetric uncertainties for OARs and target structures, according to accumulated dose.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansPancreasRadiometryRadiotherapy Dosage

Identifiers

PMID34400267
PMCPMC8651043
OpenAlexW3195546774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.