ArticleContraception2021
Self-removal of long-acting reversible contraception: A content analysis of YouTube videos.
Article in Contraception, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postpartum Intrauterine Device Removal and Access to Removal in the 18 Months Following an Intervention in Tanzania, Sri Lanka, and Nepal.Studies in family planning · 2026Trial
- Pain experiences during intrauterine device procedures: a thematic analysis of tweets.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2024Article
- Building Community and Identity Online: A Content Analysis of Highly Viewed #Autism TikTok Videos.Autism in adulthood · 2024Article
- YouTube and the implementation and discontinuation of the oral contraceptive pill: A mixed-method content analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- [Contraception on YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok : A content and quality analysis].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Article
- Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health self-care among women, healthcare providers, and other key informants: a mixed-methods study in South Africa and Zambia.Reproductive health · 2023Article
- Intrauterine device self-removal practices during the COVID-19 pandemic among family planning clinics.Contraception · 2023Article
- "She told me no, that you cannot change": Understanding provider refusal to remove contraceptive implants.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2022Article
- Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendations: Contraceptive Care in the Context of Pandemic Response.Contraception · 2022Article
- Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2022Article
- IUD self-removal as self-care: Research is needed in low and middle-income countries.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022Article
- "Women's health (London, England)Article
- From pain gaslighting to gender biases in women's accounts of hysteroscopy: A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore publicly available information about the self-removal of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) on a popular video-sharing website. STUDY
designWe conducted a comprehensive keyword search of YouTube videos related to self-removal of LARC-namely intrauterine devices and implants. We analyzed video content to explore demographic characteristics, method and duration of LARC use, and motivations and experiences of self-removal.
resultsOur keyword search identified 58 videos that met the criteria for inclusion, including 48 videos that featured individuals who removed an intrauterine device and 10 who removed an implant. Collectively, videos had over 4 million views. We identified most video creators as white (53%), 31% as Black, and 14% as Latinx. Users were motivated to remove their own device by both preferences and barriers to formal care. Most individuals in our sample (n = 56/58) successfully removed their device and described their experience in positive terms related to the ease of removal. Reasons for LARC discontinuation included negative side effects, fear of potential side effects, and desire for pregnancy.
conclusionThis study builds upon prior research by describing publicly available information about LARC self-removal. The over representation of Black women in our sample may reflect a higher prevalence of LARC self-removal among this population. Positive experiences of self-removal and high levels of viewer engagement with online videos suggest a need for provider counseling on LARC removal at the time of insertion. IMPLICATIONS: Prior to LARC insertion, patients should be made aware of any financial requirements for discontinuation. Provider counseling for self-removal at the time of insertion will likely minimize health risks and affirm patient reproductive autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.