Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34399810›Full record

ArticleHereditary cancer in clinical practice2021

Significant detection of new germline pathogenic variants in Australian Pancreatic Cancer Screening Program participants.

Krithika Murali, Tanya M Dwarte, Mehrdad Nikfarjam, Katherine M Tucker, Rhys B Vaughan, Marios Efthymiou, Allison Collins, Allan D Spigelman, Lucinda Salmon, Amber L Johns and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer patients from Yunnan Province in southwest China.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Krithika MuraliDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5581-2039
Tanya M DwarteAustralian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-7820
Mehrdad NikfarjamDivision of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4866-276X
Katherine M TuckerHereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7180-6576
Rhys B VaughanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-1734
Marios EfthymiouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2569-5163
Allison CollinsClinical Trials Unit, Olivia Newton John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-4637
Allan D SpigelmanUniversity of New South Wales, St Vincent's Clinical School and Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7409-1684
Lucinda SalmonDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-0829
Amber L JohnsAustralian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1948-6683
David B WilliamsDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0808-0311
Martin B DelatyckiDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8769-2569
Thomas JohnPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3399-5342
Alina StoitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia. alina.stoita@svha.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-2149
Austin Health · AUUNSW Sydney · AUGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AUOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Australian Pancreatic Cancer Screening Program (APCSP) offers endoscopic ultrasound surveillance for individuals at increased risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with all participants requiring assessment by a Familial Cancer Service before or after study enrolment.

methodsIndividuals aged 40-80 years (or 10 years younger than the earliest PDAC diagnosis) were eligible for APCSP study entry if they had 1) ≥ two blood relatives with PDAC (at least one of first-degree association); 2) a clinical or genetic diagnosis of Hereditary Pancreatitis or Peutz-Jeghers syndrome irrespective of PDAC family history; or 3) a known PDAC predisposition germline pathogenic variant (BRCA2, PALB2, CDKN2A, or Lynch syndrome) with ≥one PDAC-affected first- or second-degree relative. Retrospective medical record review was conducted for APCSP participants enrolled at the participating Australian hospitals from January 2011 to December 2019. We audited the genetic investigations offered by multiple Familial Cancer Services who assessed APCSP participants according to national guidelines, local clinical protocol and/or the availability of external research-funded testing, and the subsequent findings. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel.

resultsOf 189 kindreds (285 participants), 50 kindreds (71 participants) had a known germline pathogenic variant at enrolment (BRCA2 n = 35, PALB2 n = 6, CDKN2A n = 3, STK11 n = 3, PRSS1 n = 2, MLH1 n = 1). Forty-eight of 136 (35%) kindreds with no known germline pathogenic variant were offered mutation analysis; 89% was clinic-funded, with increasing self-funded testing since 2016. The relatively low rates of genetic testing performed reflects initial strict criteria for clinic-funded genetic testing. New germline pathogenic variants were detected in five kindreds (10.4%) after study enrolment (BRCA2 n = 3 kindreds, PALB2 n = 1, CDKN2A n = 1). Of note, only eight kindreds were reassessed by a Familial Cancer Service since enrolment, with a further 21 kindreds identified as being suitable for reassessment.

conclusionGermline pathogenic variants associated with PDAC were seen in 29.1% of our high-risk cohort (55/189 kindreds; 82/285 participants). Importantly, 10.4% of kindreds offered genetic testing were newly identified as having germline pathogenic variants, with majority being BRCA2. As genetic testing standards evolve rapidly in PDAC, 5-yearly reassessment of high-risk individuals by Familial Cancer Services is warranted.

Indexed as

Cancer screeningGeneticsGenetic testingHereditary Cancer syndromesPancreatic cancerPathogenic variant

Identifiers

PMID34399810
PMCPMC8365963
OpenAlexW3194489707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.