Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34399772›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021

Deep reinforcement learning for modeling human locomotion control in neuromechanical simulation.

Seungmoon Song, Łukasz Kidziński, Xue Bin Peng, Carmichael Ong, Jennifer Hicks, Sergey Levine, Christopher G Atkeson, Scott L Delp

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Progress and application of machine learning in sports injury research].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biomechanical models in the lower-limb exoskeletons development: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ethnokinesiology: towards a neuromechanical understanding of cultural differences in movement.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Impact of sole designs of offloading AFO on gait dynamics: a predictive neuromechanical simulation study.Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seungmoon SongDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. smsong@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4358-5948
Łukasz KidzińskiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Xue Bin PengDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Carmichael OngDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jennifer HicksDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sergey LevineDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Christopher G AtkesonRobotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Scott L DelpDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USCarnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

Training CoreU54EB020405 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DELP, SCOTT L · 2014 to 2018
$11.6M
Simulation framework to develop ankle exoskeleton gait assistance for older adultsK99AG065524 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SONG, SEUNGMOON · 2020 to 2021
$257k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG065524NIA NIH HHS K99AG065524NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020405NIBIB NIH HHS U54EB020405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling human motor control and predicting how humans will move in novel environments is a grand scientific challenge. Researchers in the fields of biomechanics and motor control have proposed and evaluated motor control models via neuromechanical simulations, which produce physically correct motions of a musculoskeletal model. Typically, researchers have developed control models that encode physiologically plausible motor control hypotheses and compared the resulting simulation behaviors to measurable human motion data. While such plausible control models were able to simulate and explain many basic locomotion behaviors (e.g. walking, running, and climbing stairs), modeling higher layer controls (e.g. processing environment cues, planning long-term motion strategies, and coordinating basic motor skills to navigate in dynamic and complex environments) remains a challenge. Recent advances in deep reinforcement learning lay a foundation for modeling these complex control processes and controlling a diverse repertoire of human movement; however, reinforcement learning has been rarely applied in neuromechanical simulation to model human control. In this paper, we review the current state of neuromechanical simulations, along with the fundamentals of reinforcement learning, as it applies to human locomotion. We also present a scientific competition and accompanying software platform, which we have organized to accelerate the use of reinforcement learning in neuromechanical simulations. This "Learn to Move" competition was an official competition at the NeurIPS conference from 2017 to 2019 and attracted over 1300 teams from around the world. Top teams adapted state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning techniques and produced motions, such as quick turning and walk-to-stand transitions, that have not been demonstrated before in neuromechanical simulations without utilizing reference motion data. We close with a discussion of future opportunities at the intersection of human movement simulation and reinforcement learning and our plans to extend the Learn to Move competition to further facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration in modeling human motor control for biomechanics and rehabilitation research.

Indexed as

LocomotionReinforcement, PsychologyBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationHumansWalkingAcademic competitionBiomechanicsDeep reinforcement learningLocomotionMotor controlMusculoskeletal modelingNeuromechanical simulation

Identifiers

PMID34399772
PMCPMC8365920
OpenAlexW3193778841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.