ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2021
Deep reinforcement learning for modeling human locomotion control in neuromechanical simulation.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experiment protocols for brain-body imaging of locomotion: A systematic review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- Unified comparison of spinal locomotion control architectures in neuromechanical simulations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Predictive Neuromechanical Simulation Explains Gait Biomechanics in Obesity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- [Progress and application of machine learning in sports injury research].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Review
- Reinforcement Learning-Based Golf Swing Correction Framework Incorporating Temporal Rhythm and Kinematic Stability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial embodied circuits uncover neural architectures of vertebrate visuomotor behaviors.Science robotics · 2025Article
- Embodied sensorimotor control: computational modeling of the neural control of movement.ArXiv · 2025Article
- A PRISMA systematic review through time on predictive musculoskeletal simulations.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Emergence of natural and robust bipedal walking by learning from biologically plausible objectives.iScience · 2025Article
- Predicting badminton outcomes through machine learning and technical action frequencies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cloud and IoT based smart agent-driven simulation of human gait for detecting muscles disorder.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Biomechanical models in the lower-limb exoskeletons development: a review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced assessment of fundamental motor skills: validity and reliability of the FUS test for jumping rope performance.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Comparison of synergy extrapolation and static optimization for estimating multiple unmeasured muscle activations during walking.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Ethnokinesiology: towards a neuromechanical understanding of cultural differences in movement.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- NeuroMotion: Open-source platform with neuromechanical and deep network modules to generate surface EMG signals during voluntary movement.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Effect of hyperthermia on simulated muscle activation in female when crossing obstacle.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- NSF DARE-Transforming modeling in neurorehabilitation: Four threads for catalyzing progress.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Review
- Design of Low-Cost Modular Bio-Inspired Electric-Pneumatic Actuator (EPA)-Driven Legged Robots.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impact of sole designs of offloading AFO on gait dynamics: a predictive neuromechanical simulation study.Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Modeling human motor control and predicting how humans will move in novel environments is a grand scientific challenge. Researchers in the fields of biomechanics and motor control have proposed and evaluated motor control models via neuromechanical simulations, which produce physically correct motions of a musculoskeletal model. Typically, researchers have developed control models that encode physiologically plausible motor control hypotheses and compared the resulting simulation behaviors to measurable human motion data. While such plausible control models were able to simulate and explain many basic locomotion behaviors (e.g. walking, running, and climbing stairs), modeling higher layer controls (e.g. processing environment cues, planning long-term motion strategies, and coordinating basic motor skills to navigate in dynamic and complex environments) remains a challenge. Recent advances in deep reinforcement learning lay a foundation for modeling these complex control processes and controlling a diverse repertoire of human movement; however, reinforcement learning has been rarely applied in neuromechanical simulation to model human control. In this paper, we review the current state of neuromechanical simulations, along with the fundamentals of reinforcement learning, as it applies to human locomotion. We also present a scientific competition and accompanying software platform, which we have organized to accelerate the use of reinforcement learning in neuromechanical simulations. This "Learn to Move" competition was an official competition at the NeurIPS conference from 2017 to 2019 and attracted over 1300 teams from around the world. Top teams adapted state-of-the-art deep reinforcement learning techniques and produced motions, such as quick turning and walk-to-stand transitions, that have not been demonstrated before in neuromechanical simulations without utilizing reference motion data. We close with a discussion of future opportunities at the intersection of human movement simulation and reinforcement learning and our plans to extend the Learn to Move competition to further facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration in modeling human motor control for biomechanics and rehabilitation research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.