Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34399721›Full record

Trial reportBMC pulmonary medicine2021

Effectiveness of one-on-one coaching in improving pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) technique among COPD patients: a prospective clinical study.

Jin Sun Kim, Nader Hashweh, Hannah Li, Salik Choudhary, Sadashiv Santosh, Edward Charbek

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Improving Patient-Centric COPD Management.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jin Sun KimDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Ave, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA. jinsunkim99@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1232-5326
Nader HashwehDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Ave, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Hannah LiDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Ave, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Salik ChoudharyDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Ave, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Sadashiv SantoshDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Ave, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Edward CharbekDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Ave, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Saint Louis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncorrect use of inhalers among asthma and COPD patients is very prevalent. Yet, no single intervention is considered standard of care. We aimed to conduct a COPD-specific investigation of active one-on-one coaching as the educational intervention to improve pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) technique and COPD symptoms management.

methodsCOPD patients who have pMDI in their treatment regimen were enrolled in this prospective study using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria. After rapid cognitive screen, inhaler technique was assessed and an active one-on-one coaching was provided utilizing the 12-step American Thoracic Society instructions. Patients' inhaler technique was assessed and scored again at their regular follow-up visits.

resultsOne hundred and one patients participated in the study. The percentage of pMDI misuse decreased from 43.5% pre-teaching to 12.9% post-teaching (binomial test p value < 0.001). The mean number of errors decreased from 3.1 errors pre-teaching to 1.7 errors post-teaching (paired t-test p value < 0.001). The number needed to treat was 3.3 patients to prevent one misuse. Patients with an impaired cognitive function were more likely to have inhaler misuse in general and less likely to improve their technique when provided training.

conclusionsThis study reveals that many COPD patients have incorrect pMDI techniques that can be improved with a short training in the clinic.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

MentoringMetered Dose InhalersPatient Education as TopicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesCOPD patientsEducational interventionInhaler techniqueOne-on-one coachingpMDI

Identifiers

PMID34399721
PMCPMC8365924
OpenAlexW3196043326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.