Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34399693›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Women's barriers for contacting general practice when experiencing gynecological cancer symptoms: a population-based study.

Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Sanne Rasmussen, Peter Fentz Haastrup, Kaspar Suadicani, Jens Søndergaard, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirubakaran BalasubramaniamDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. kiruba@health.sdu.dk.
Sanne RasmussenDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Peter Fentz HaastrupDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Kaspar SuadicaniUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jens SøndergaardDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Dorte Ejg JarbølDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA prerequisite for general practitioners (GPs) being able to refer patients with gynecological cancer alarm symptoms for further investigations is that individuals present the symptoms to the GP. Not all symptoms are presented to the GP, and knowledge of barriers for healthcare-seeking is sparse. The aim of this study was to analyze associations between age, socioeconomic status, and common barriers ("being too embarrassed", "being too busy", "worried about wasting the doctors time" and "worried what the GP might find") towards GP contact with gynecological alarm symptoms.

methodsNationwide population-based study in Denmark based on a random sample of 51 090 women aged 20 years or older. A web-based questionnaire regarding experience of four predefined alarm symptoms of gynecological cancer, decisions about contact to GPs, and barriers towards GP contact was distributed. Information about socioeconomic status was collected from Statistics Denmark.

resultsA total of 26 466 women (54.5%) completed the questionnaire. The proportion of women with no contact to the GP varied between 64.6% and 78.1% for postmenopausal bleeding and pain during intercourse, respectively. Between 32.3% (bleeding during intercourse) and 45.3% (postmenopausal bleeding) of the women reported no barriers for GP contact. The proportions of reported barriers ranged from 7.5% for being too embarrassed (pelvic pain) to 26.8% for being too busy (bleeding during intercourse). Women aged 40-59 years had lower odds of reporting "being too embarrassed" and "worried about wasting the GP´s time", while women aged 60 + years of age had lower odds of reporting "being too busy" compared to the youngest age group. Women in the highest income groups had lower odds of reporting "being too embarrassed" and "wasting the GP´s time" compared to those with a low income, while those with high educational level had lower odds of reporting "being too embarrassed" and "worried what the GP might find" compared to those with low educational level.

conclusionsMore than half of the respondents with no contact to the GP, reported one or more barriers towards GP contact. Lower age and socioeconomic status were significantly associated with higher odds of reporting barriers. As this may explain the differences in healthcare seeking behavior, healthcare planners, policy makers and clinicians should be aware of these findings.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersNeoplasmsFemaleHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesBarriersGynecological cancerHealthcare seekingSocioeconomic statusSymptoms

Identifiers

PMID34399693
PMCPMC8369740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.