Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34399434›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of perinatology2023

Prediction and Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Prospective, Randomized Intervention Trial.

D Ware Branch, John M VanBuren, T Flint Porter, Calla Holmgren, Richard Holubkov, Kent Page, Julja Burchard, Garrett K Lam, M Sean Esplin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of perinatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03530332 (Prediction and Prevention of Preterm Birth), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03530332 naterminatednot on this map

Prediction and Prevention of Preterm Birth: A Prospective, Randomized Intervention Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWare BranchRan2018 to 2019Enrolled1,208ConditionsPreterm BirthArmsPreTRM test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Preterm Birth: Screening and Prediction.International journal of women's health · 2023
    Review
  9. Cost-Effectiveness of a Proteomic Test for Preterm Birth Prediction.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D Ware BranchDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Intermountain Healthcare Maternal-Fetal Medicine and University of Utah Health, Murray, Utah.
John M VanBurenDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health, Murray, Utah.
T Flint PorterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Intermountain Healthcare Maternal-Fetal Medicine and University of Utah Health, Murray, Utah.
Calla HolmgrenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Intermountain Healthcare Maternal-Fetal Medicine and University of Utah Health, Murray, Utah.
Richard HolubkovDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health, Murray, Utah.
Kent PageDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health, Murray, Utah.
Julja BurchardSera Prognostics, Inc., Department of Research & Development, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Garrett K LamHigh Risk Pregnancy Center, Las Vegas, Nevada.
M Sean EsplinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Intermountain Healthcare Maternal-Fetal Medicine and University of Utah Health, Murray, Utah.
Intermountain Healthcare · USUniversity of Utah Health Care · USFertility Center of Las Vegas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aimed to determine if a program of mid-trimester serum proteomics screening of women at low risk for spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) and the use of a PTB risk-reduction protocol in those whose results indicated an increased risk of sPTB would reduce the likelihood of sPTB and its sequelae. STUDY

designProspective comparison of birth outcomes in singleton pregnancies with mid-trimester cervical length ≥2.5 cm and at otherwise low risk for sPTB randomized to undergo or not undergo mid-trimester serum proteomics screening for increased risk of sPTB (NCT03530332). Screen-positive women were offered a group of interventions aimed at reducing the risk of spontaneous PTB. The primary outcome was the rate of sPTB <37 weeks, and secondary outcomes were gestational age at delivery, total length of neonatal stay, and NICU length of stay (LOS). Unscreened and screen-negative women received standard care. The adaptive study design targeted a sample size of 3,000 to 10,000 women to detect a reduction in sPTB from 6.4 to 4.7%. Due to limited resources, the trial was stopped early prior to data unblinding.

resultsA total of 1,191 women were randomized. Screened and unscreened women were demographically similar. sPTB <37 weeks occurred in 2.7% of screened women and 3.5% of controls (

conclusionMid-trimester serum proteomics screening of women at low risk for sPTB and the use of a sPTB risk-reduction protocol in screen-positive patients did not significantly reduce the rate of sPTB compared with women not screened, though the trial was underpowered thus limiting the interpretation of negative findings. Infants in the screened group had a significantly shorter NICU LOS, a difference likely due to a reduced number of infants in the screened group that delivered <35 weeks. KEY POINTS: · Mid-trimester serum proteomics screening of women at low risk for sPTB and the use of a sPTB risk-reduction protocol in screen-positive patients did not significantly reduce the rate of sPTB, though the trial was underpowered.. · NICU LOS following sPTB was significantly shortened among women who underwent screening and risk-reduction management.. · The use of serum biomarkers may contribute to a practical strategy to reduce sPTB sequelae..

Indexed as

Premature BirthCervical Length MeasurementCervix UteriFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID34399434
PMCPMC10332856
OpenAlexW3193741151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.