Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398902›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Rabies epidemiology, prevention and control in Nigeria: Scoping progress towards elimination.

Philip P Mshelbwala, J Scott Weese, Olufunmilayo A Sanni-Adeniyi, Shovon Chakma, Stephen S Okeme, Abdullah A Mamun, Charles E Rupprecht, R J Soares Magalhaes

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. An evaluation of the impact of anti-rabies programs in Nigeria.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Philip P MshelbwalaUQ Spatial Epidemiology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6834-1456
J Scott WeeseDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1896-1937
Olufunmilayo A Sanni-AdeniyiFederal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-5784-1148
Shovon ChakmaUQ Spatial Epidemiology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9258-3148
Stephen S OkemeAgriculture & Rural Development Secretariat, Federal Capital Territory Administration Abuja Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-7702-8253
Abdullah A MamunInstitute of Social Science Research, the University of Queensland, Long Pocket, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1535-8086
Charles E RupprechtRabies Section, LYSSA LLC, Cumming, Georgia, United States of America.
R J Soares MagalhaesUQ Spatial Epidemiology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9157-8470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman rabies remains a significant public health problem in Africa with outbreaks reported in most countries. In Nigeria-the most populous country in Africa-rabies causes a significant public health burden partly due to perennial obstacles to implementing a national prevention and control program.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review using standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify and select published articles from Nigeria during 1978-2020 reporting on rabies virus infections (human, canine, livestock, and wildlife), canine bites, knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) surveys on rabies and canine ecology studies. We extracted information on study location, year and additional details of each study such as rabies prevalence, general characteristics of offending dogs, dog vaccination status and health-seeking behaviours.

findingsBetween 1978 and 2020, 90 published articles met our inclusion criteria. The prevalence of rabies virus antigen detection varied between 3% and 28%, with more studies in the north. Most bites were unprovoked from dog bite studies (36.4%-97%), by dogs with low vaccination rates (12-38%). A more significant proportion of biting dogs were owned (31-90%). Laboratory confirmation for biting was available for only a small proportion of studies (6%; n = 2/32). Of the dogs surveyed during ecology studies, indigenous dogs accounted for the majority (62-98%), used mostly for security purposes (52-98%), with the vaccination rate between 15% and 38% in most states. Studies conducted in areas distant from rabies diagnostic facilities accounted for more human rabies cases and fewer dog rabies cases.

conclusionSignificant improvements are necessary to achieve the elimination of human rabies mediated via dogs by 2030.

Indexed as

DogsAnimalsBites and StingsHumansNigeriaOwnershipPrevalenceRabiesRabies VaccinesSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34398902
PMCPMC8389847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.