Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398891›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Transmission of 'Candidatus Anaplasma camelii' to mice and rabbits by camel-specific keds, Hippobosca camelina.

Joel L Bargul, Kevin O Kidambasi, Merid N Getahun, Jandouwe Villinger, Robert S Copeland, Jackson M Muema, Mark Carrington, Daniel K Masiga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Detection ofVeterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Discovery of the vector of visceral leishmaniasis,Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular detection of novelOpen research Africa · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joel L BargulInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-8573-6807
Kevin O KidambasiInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Merid N GetahunInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Jandouwe VillingerInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
Robert S CopelandInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-4865-5412
Jackson M MuemaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-5713-5067
Mark CarringtonDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Daniel K MasigaInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), Nairobi, Kenya.
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology · KEUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 107742/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 217138/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaplasmosis, caused by infection with bacteria of the genus Anaplasma, is an important veterinary and zoonotic disease. Transmission by ticks has been characterized but little is known about non-tick vectors of livestock anaplasmosis. This study investigated the presence of Anaplasma spp. in camels in northern Kenya and whether the hematophagous camel ked, Hippobosca camelina, acts as a vector. Camels (n = 976) and > 10,000 keds were sampled over a three-year study period and the presence of Anaplasma species was determined by PCR-based assays targeting the Anaplasmataceae 16S rRNA gene. Camels were infected by a single species of Anaplasma, 'Candidatus Anaplasma camelii', with infection rates ranging from 63-78% during the dry (September 2017), wet (June-July 2018), and late wet seasons (July-August 2019). 10-29% of camel keds harbored 'Ca. Anaplasma camelii' acquired from infected camels during blood feeding. We determined that Anaplasma-positive camel keds could transmit 'Ca. Anaplasma camelii' to mice and rabbits via blood-feeding. We show competence in pathogen transmission and subsequent infection in mice and rabbits by microscopic observation in blood smears and by PCR. Transmission of 'Ca. Anaplasma camelii' to mice (8-47%) and rabbits (25%) occurred readily after ked bites. Hence, we demonstrate, for the first time, the potential of H. camelina as a vector of anaplasmosis. This key finding provides the rationale for establishing ked control programmes for improvement of livestock and human health.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasmosisAnimalsCamelusDipteraDisease VectorsKenyaMiceRabbits

Identifiers

PMID34398891
PMCPMC8389426
OpenAlexW3196055360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.