Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398877›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Understanding community member and health care professional perspectives on gender-affirming care-A qualitative study.

Stephanie Loo, Anthony N Almazan, Virginia Vedilago, Brooke Stott, Sari L Reisner, Alex S Keuroghlian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie LooThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2733-7426
Anthony N AlmazanHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8499-684X
Virginia VedilagoThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Brooke StottThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sari L ReisnerThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Alex S KeuroghlianThe Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransgender and gender diverse (TGD) people experience significant barriers to accessing affirming health services. There is a paucity of literature examining how both community members and health care professionals (HCPs) understand potential causes and solutions for these barriers, particularly in non-urban settings.

objectiveWe present the first systematic examination of perspectives from community members and HCPs regarding barriers to and solutions for promoting access to gender-affirming health care.

designStudy activities were conducted through the Plan and Act for Transgender Health (PATH) Project, a health needs assessment of TGD people. Community members in the catchment area were recruited to participate in focus group discussions about access to gender-affirming health care and optimal health service delivery models in March-October 2019. HCPs were recruited to participate in focus group discussions or in-depth interviews about experiences working with TGD clients. Data were analyzed using an inductive grounded theory approach.

setting25 rural counties in Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut, Vermont, and New Hampshire.

participantsStudy participants included 61 adult TGD community members and 23 HCPs working in the catchment area.

resultsBoth community members and HCPs spoke of the need for connectedness and linkages among disparate health system components for gender-affirming health care. Participants expressed this priority through calls for systems-level improvements within existing services (e.g., expanded data collection, expanded mental health services, inclusive and affirming health care environments, and TGD staff). They also expressed the need for expanded TGD community outreach and engagement (e.g., incorporation of a patient feedback process, TGD health navigators, and resource mapping). LIMITATIONS: Findings specifically reflect the perspectives of community members and HCPs in the rural New England area. Furthermore, the study sample was predominantly White non-Hispanic.

conclusionInterventions to achieve accessible gender-affirming health care must address the diverse perspectives and needs of both community members and HCPs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGender IdentityHealth Services AccessibilityAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTransgender PersonsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34398877
PMCPMC8366980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.