Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398790›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Development and Validation of an Arterial Pressure-Based Cardiac Output Algorithm Using a Convolutional Neural Network: Retrospective Study Based on Prospective Registry Data.

Hyun-Lim Yang, Chul-Woo Jung, Seong Mi Yang, Min-Soo Kim, Sungho Shim, Kook Hyun Lee, Hyung-Chul Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyun-Lim YangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2221-3042
Chul-Woo JungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7876-8659
Seong Mi YangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4686-5822
Min-Soo KimSchool of Computing, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5065-0226
Sungho ShimDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology (DGIST), Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2235-6142
Kook Hyun LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6493-0472
Hyung-Chul LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-7958

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArterial pressure-based cardiac output (APCO) is a less invasive method for estimating cardiac output without concerns about complications from the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). However, inaccuracies of currently available APCO devices have been reported. Improvements to the algorithm by researchers are impossible, as only a subset of the algorithm has been released.

objectiveIn this study, an open-source algorithm was developed and validated using a convolutional neural network and a transfer learning technique.

methodsA retrospective study was performed using data from a prospective cohort registry of intraoperative bio-signal data from a university hospital. The convolutional neural network model was trained using the arterial pressure waveform as input and the stroke volume (SV) value as the output. The model parameters were pretrained using the SV values from a commercial APCO device (Vigileo or EV1000 with the FloTrac algorithm) and adjusted with a transfer learning technique using SV values from the PAC. The performance of the model was evaluated using absolute error for the PAC on the testing dataset from separate periods. Finally, we compared the performance of the deep learning model and the FloTrac with the SV values from the PAC.

resultsA total of 2057 surgical cases (1958 training and 99 testing cases) were used in the registry. In the deep learning model, the absolute errors of SV were 14.5 (SD 13.4) mL (10.2 [SD 8.4] mL in cardiac surgery and 17.4 [SD 15.3] mL in liver transplantation). Compared with FloTrac, the absolute errors of the deep learning model were significantly smaller (16.5 [SD 15.4] and 18.3 [SD 15.1], P<.001).

conclusionsThe deep learning-based APCO algorithm showed better performance than the commercial APCO device. Further improvement of the algorithm developed in this study may be helpful for estimating cardiac output accurately in clinical practice and optimizing high-risk patient care.

Indexed as

arterial pressurecardiac outputdeep learning

Identifiers

PMID34398790
PMCPMC8406105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.