Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398784›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Semisupervised Deep Learning Techniques for Predicting Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome From Time-Series Clinical Data: Model Development and Validation Study.

Carson Lam, Chak Foon Tso, Abigail Green-Saxena, Emily Pellegrini, Zohora Iqbal, Daniel Evans, Jana Hoffman, Jacob Calvert, Qingqing Mao, Ritankar Das

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Lung Imaging and Artificial Intelligence in ARDS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carson LamDascena, Inc, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8255-4423
Chak Foon TsoDascena, Inc, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6339-4276
Abigail Green-SaxenaDascena, Inc, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-6589
Emily PellegriniDascena, Inc, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7614-9299
Zohora IqbalDascena, Inc, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-8367
Daniel EvansDascena, Inc, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-9263
Jana HoffmanDascena, Inc, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-3900
Jacob CalvertDascena, Inc, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9173-0946
Qingqing MaoDascena, Inc, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6001-6723
Ritankar DasDascena, Inc, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1326-844X
Dascena (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA high number of patients who are hospitalized with COVID-19 develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

objectiveIn response to the need for clinical decision support tools to help manage the next pandemic during the early stages (ie, when limited labeled data are present), we developed machine learning algorithms that use semisupervised learning (SSL) techniques to predict ARDS development in general and COVID-19 populations based on limited labeled data.

methodsSSL techniques were applied to 29,127 encounters with patients who were admitted to 7 US hospitals from May 1, 2019, to May 1, 2021. A recurrent neural network that used a time series of electronic health record data was applied to data that were collected when a patient's peripheral oxygen saturation level fell below the normal range (<97%) to predict the subsequent development of ARDS during the remaining duration of patients' hospital stay. Model performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the precision recall curve of an external hold-out test set.

resultsFor the whole data set, the median time between the first peripheral oxygen saturation measurement of <97% and subsequent respiratory failure was 21 hours. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting subsequent ARDS development was 0.73 when the model was trained on a labeled data set of 6930 patients, 0.78 when the model was trained on the labeled data set that had been augmented with the unlabeled data set of 16,173 patients by using SSL techniques, and 0.84 when the model was trained on the entire training set of 23,103 labeled patients.

conclusionsIn the context of using time-series inpatient data and a careful model training design, unlabeled data can be used to improve the performance of machine learning models when labeled data for predicting ARDS development are scarce or expensive.

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromealgorithmCOVID-19decision supportdeep learningmachine learningpredictionsemisupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID34398784
PMCPMC8447921
OpenAlexW3188218986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.