Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398721›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2022

Robotics for neuroendovascular intervention: Background and primer.

Kazim H Narsinh, Ricardo Paez, Kerstin Mueller, M Travis Caton, Amanda Baker, Randall T Higashida, Van V Halbach, Christopher F Dowd, Matthew R Amans, Steven W Hetts and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kazim H NarsinhDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-5461
Ricardo PaezDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Kerstin MuellerSiemens Medical Solutions, Inc., USA.
M Travis CatonDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Amanda BakerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Randall T HigashidaDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Van V HalbachDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Christopher F DowdDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Matthew R AmansDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Steven W HettsDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.
Alexander M NorbashDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego, USA.
Daniel L CookeDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, USA.

Funding

VCRC Administration UnitU54NS065705 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KIM, HELEN · 2009 to 2023
$20.8M
Clinical and Translational Training Program in Pulmonary MedicineT32HL087738 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lorraine B Ware · 2007 to 2026
$7.0M
Endovascular Magnetic Catheter for Interventional MRIR01EB012031 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HETTS, STEVEN WILLIAM, MARTIN, ALASTAIR J · 2011 to 2021
$4.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL087738NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB012031NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS065705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The simultaneous growth of robotic-assisted surgery and telemedicine in recent years has only been accelerated by the recent coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Robotic assistance for neurovascular intervention has garnered significant interest due to opportunities for tele-stroke models of care for remote underserved areas. Lessons learned from medical robots in interventional cardiology and neurosurgery have contributed to incremental but vital advances in medical robotics despite important limitations. In this article, we discuss robot types and their clinical justification and ethics, as well as a general overview on available robots in thoracic/abdominal surgery, neurosurgery, and cardiac electrophysiology. We conclude with current clinical research in neuroendovascular intervention and a perspective on future directions.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeurosurgeryRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansSARS-CoV-2ethicsneurointerventionalRoboticsstroketelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34398721
PMCPMC8826289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.