ArticleGenes, chromosomes & cancer2021
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors with BRAF gene fusions. A report of two cases showing low or absent KIT expression resulting in diagnostic pitfalls.
Article in Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive genomic profiling of mucosal melanoma reveals novel fusion transcripts and dysregulation of cell-cycle, MAPK, and PI3K pathways.The Journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor WithAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: History, Molecular Subtypes, and Risk Stratification.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- NovelPathology oncology research : POR · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological Spectrum of Myxoid Soft Tissue Tumours with Emphasis on Diagnostic Differentials.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2025Article
- RareHeliyon · 2024Article
- Gene Mutations in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Advances in Treatment and Mechanism Research.Global medical genetics · 2024Review
- Fusion Challenges in Solid Tumors: Shaping the Landscape of Cancer Care in Precision Medicine.JCO precision oncology · 2024Review
- Pathologic diagnosis and molecular features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a mini-review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Emerging Targeted Therapeutic Strategies to Overcome Imatinib Resistance of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Molecular Mechanisms of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Their Impact on Systemic Therapy Decision.Cancers · 2023Review
- Review
- AGAP3: A novel BRAF fusion partner in pediatric pancreatic-type acinar cell carcinoma.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2022Article
- Current Molecular Profile of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Systemic Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2022Review
- FGFR2::TACC2 fusion as a novel KIT-independent mechanism of targeted therapy failure in a multidrug-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Genes, chromosomes & cancer · 2022Article
- Article
- [Mesenchymal tumors and tumor-like lesions of the gastrointestinal tract: an overview].Der Pathologe · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) exhibit activating mutations in either KIT or PDGFRA, rare cases have shown to be driven by gene fusions involving kinases, mainly involving NTRK3, and rarely BRAF or FGFR1. BRAF gene rearrangements have been described in only two patients to date, as separate case reports. In addition, BRAF V600E mutation is an uncommon but established oncogenic pathway in GIST. In this report, we describe two new GIST cases harboring novel BRAF fusion genes, arising in two young-adult women (37 and 40 years of age) in the small bowel and distal esophagus, both with a spindle cell phenotype. The small bowel GIST measured 2.8 cm and showed a high cellularity and a mitotic rate of 20/50 HPFs, while the esophageal lesion measured 7 cm and 1/50 HPFs. Immunohistochemically, both tumors showed diffuse reactivity for DOG1, while KIT/CD117 was weakly positive in the small bowel GIST and completely negative in the esophageal tumor. Based on these findings, the latter case was misinterpreted as a low-grade myxoid leiomyosarcoma, as it showed a myxoid stroma, reactivity for SMA and focal positivity for desmin. Archer FusionPlex revealed a fusion between BRAF with either AGAP3 or MKRN1 gene partners. Moreover, MSK-IMPACT DNA targeted sequencing confirmed both fusions but did not identify additional mutations. In one case with available material, the BRAF gene rearrangement was also validated by FISH. The recognition of BRAF fusion-positive GISTs is critical as it may be associated with a low level of KIT expression and may result in diagnostic challenges with significant impact on therapeutic management. The clinical benefit with KIT inhibitors, such as imatinib, remains to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.