Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398438›Full record

SynthesisAging clinical and experimental research2022

Prevalence of sarcopenia according to EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 in older adults and their associations with unfavorable health outcomes: a systematic review.

Lara Vilar Fernandes, Alexandre Elias Gomes Paiva, Ana Clara Borges Silva, Isabela Coelho de Castro, Andrezza Fernanda Santiago, Erick P de Oliveira, Laura Cristina Jardim Porto

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Metabolic profiles associated with fat loss in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Silent destruction: hidden muscle wasting and body decline in early Huntington's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lara Vilar FernandesGraduate Program in Nutrition and Health-PPGNS, Federal University of Lavras-UFLA, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3431-4393
Alexandre Elias Gomes PaivaDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Lavras-UFLA, University Campus, Lavras, 37200-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9890-6166
Ana Clara Borges SilvaDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Lavras-UFLA, University Campus, Lavras, 37200-000, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2578-0600
Isabela Coelho de CastroGraduate Program in Nutrition and Health-PPGNS, Federal University of Lavras-UFLA, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-1280
Andrezza Fernanda SantiagoGraduate Program in Nutrition and Health-PPGNS, Federal University of Lavras-UFLA, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0894-5693
Erick P de Oliveira *Laboratory of Nutrition, Exercise and Health (LaNES), School of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlandia (UFU), Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8989-8344
Laura Cristina Jardim Porto *Graduate Program in Nutrition and Health-PPGNS, Federal University of Lavras-UFLA, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil. laurap@ufla.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3373-8496
Universidade Federal de Lavras · BRUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) recently updated the definition and diagnostic criteria to assess sarcopenia, which can result in important changes in sarcopenia prevalence in older adults.

aimTo compare the prevalence of sarcopenia through the diagnostic criteria and definition proposed by the first (EWGSOP1) and recent (EWGSOP2) European consensus in older adults. We also aimed to evaluate which sarcopenia consensus is better associated with unfavorable health outcomes.

methodsThe review followed PRISMA guidelines. Embase, Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Web of Science were searched from 2018 to February 2021. The systematic review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020213303). The search, selection, and evaluation processes were done in a duplicate and independent manner.

resultsOf the 298 potentially eligible articles, 9 were included in this review. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 17.7% by EWGSOP1 and 11% by EWGSOP2. Evaluating all the studies, the sarcopenia prevalence ranged from 6.2 to 35.3% for the EWGSOP1, and from 3.2 to 26.3% for the EWGSOP2. Five studies have evaluated the association between the prevalence of sarcopenia (EWGSOP1 versus EWGSOP2) and unfavorable health outcomes, in which three studies showed that EWGSOP1 was better associated with increased risk of hospitalization and/or mortality.

conclusionIn comparison with EWGSOP1, the prevalence of sarcopenia in older adults decreased when diagnosed according to EWGSOP2. Based on limited evidence, EWGSOP2 seems to be worse for predicting unfavorable outcomes compared with EWGSOP1.

Indexed as

SarcopeniaAgedConsensusHand StrengthHumansPrevalenceElderlyMuscle massMuscle strengthOlder peoplePhysical performanceSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID34398438
OpenAlexW3193864896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.