Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398411›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2021

Echocardiographic Longitudinal Strain Analysis in Heart Failure: Real Usefulness for Clinical Management Beyond Diagnostic Value and Prognostic Correlations? A Comprehensive Review.

Giuseppe D Sanna, Mario E Canonico, Ciro Santoro, Roberta Esposito, Stefano L Masia, Maurizio Galderisi, Guido Parodi, Petros Nihoyannopoulos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe D SannaClinical and Interventional Cardiology, Sassari University Hospital, Via Enrico de Nicola, 07100, Sassari, Italy. giuseppe.sanna@aousassari.it.
Mario E CanonicoClinical and Interventional Cardiology, Sassari University Hospital, Via Enrico de Nicola, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
Ciro SantoroDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Roberta EspositoDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Stefano L MasiaClinical and Interventional Cardiology, Sassari University Hospital, Via Enrico de Nicola, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
Maurizio GalderisiDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Guido ParodiClinical and Interventional Cardiology, Sassari University Hospital, Via Enrico de Nicola, 07100, Sassari, Italy.
Petros NihoyannopoulosImperial College London (National Heart and Lung Institute), Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
University of Sassari · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a highly prevalent clinical syndrome characterized by considerable phenotypic heterogeneity. The traditional classification based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely accepted by the guidelines and represents the grounds for patient enrollment in clinical trials, even though it shows several limitations. Ejection fraction (EF) is affected by preload, afterload, and contractility, it being problematic to express LV function in several conditions, such as HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), valvular heart disease, and subclinical HF, and in athletes. Over the last two decades, developments in diagnostic techniques have provided useful tools to overcome EF limitations. Strain imaging analysis (particularly global longitudinal strain (GLS)) has emerged as a useful echocardiographic technique in patients with HF, as it is able to simultaneously supply information on both systolic and diastolic functions, depending on cardiac anatomy and physiology/pathophysiology. The use of GLS has proved helpful in terms of diagnostic performance and prognostic value in several HF studies. Universally accepted cutoff values and variability across vendors remain an area to be fully explored, hence limiting routine application of this technique in clinical practice. In the present review, the current role of GLS in the diagnosis and management of patients with HF will be discussed. We describe, by critical analysis of the pros and cons, various clinical settings in HF, and how the appropriate use and interpretation of GLS can provide important clues.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, LeftEchocardiographyHumansPrognosisStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftDiagnosisEchocardiographyHeart failureOutcomesPathophysiologyStrain imaging

Identifiers

PMID34398411
OpenAlexW3193534911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.