Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398365›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022

Assessing the perioperative complications and outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Cancer Database: is it ready for prime time?

Hassan Aziz, Muhammad Khan, Sara Khan, Guillermo P Serra, Martin D Goodman, Yuri Genyk, Mohd Raashid Sheikh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hassan AzizDivision of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Muhammad KhanDepartment of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Sara KhanDepartment of Surgery, St. David's Health Care System, Austin, TX, USA.
Guillermo P SerraSUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Martin D GoodmanDivision of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Yuri GenykDepartment of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Mohd Raashid SheikhDepartment of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. MohdRaashid.Sheikh@med.usc.edu.
University of Southern California · USTufts Medical Center · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · USWestchester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy has generated significant interest in recent years. Our study aimed to evaluate the difference in surgical, oncological, and survival outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) by either a robotic (RPD) or open approach (OPD). Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients from 2010 and 2017 diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy by either robotic PD or open approach. Patients who underwent robotic PD during 2010 were compared to patients receiving the same procedure in 2017. In addition, a secondary analysis was performed to assess outcomes of robotic PD to open PD for the 2017 patient cohorts. Our primary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day mortality, length of stay, as well as 30-day readmission. Secondary outcome measures were surgical margins, lymph node yield, and adjuvant chemotherapy initiation within 12 weeks of surgery. When we compared the 2017 data to 2010 data, we found that robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy had lower 30- and 90-day mortality rates in 2017 compared to 2010. Additionally, we found that the lymph node yield in robotic PD increased during the study period. When we compared robotic PD to open PD for 2017, we found no statistically significant differences in readmission rates (10.1% vs. 9.7%: p-0.4), lymph node yield, or negative margin between the groups. Outcomes of robotic PD have improved over the years. In 2017, outcomes of robotic PD were similar to open PD.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaPancreatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesNational Cancer DatabaseOpen pancreaticoduodenectomyRobotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID34398365
OpenAlexW3194365278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.