Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34398361›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022

The impact of chemotherapy-induced inner ear damage on quality of life in cancer survivors: a qualitative study.

Stephanie E Pearson, Charlotte Caimino, Maryam Shabbir, David M Baguley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A qualitative systematic review of the impact of hearing on quality of life.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Rate of Hearing Loss in Platinum-Naïve Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie E PearsonNottingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK. Stephanie.Pearson@nottingham.ac.uk.
Charlotte CaiminoNottingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK.
Maryam ShabbirHearing Sciences, Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, University Park, NG7 2RD, UK.
David M BaguleyNottingham Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, Ropewalk House, 113 The Ropewalk, Nottingham, NG1 5DU, UK.
National Institute for Health Research · GBNottingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to explore the burden of inner ear damage (ototoxicity) on adults living with and beyond cancer treated with chemotherapy and  the impact on their quality of life (QoL). Furthermore, this study aimed to explore patient awareness surrounding chemotherapy-induced inner ear damage, known as ototoxicity, and assess what support they had been offered.

methodsParticipants were adults who had undergone chemotherapy, recruited from cancer clinics, charities and social media. Using semi-structured interviews and fieldnotes, an inductive thematic analysis was used to develop key themes surrounding this topic.

resultsTwenty participants from the UK were interviewed. Two key themes were developed from the thematic analysis, cancer-related QoL and ototoxicity-related QoL, with each one including 5 subthemes. Subthemes consisted of impact of ototoxicity, hearing, tinnitus, clinical experience, audiological assessments, and impact of treatment, cancer and chemotherapy, other toxicities, information and patient reflections.

conclusionsOtotoxicity can have a negative impact on QoL, specifically on social life and the fear of hearing loss and/or tinnitus worsening. There are opportunities for increased awareness by patients and clinicians, including improved information sources, and hearing monitoring not only for those undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy but many others surviving after treatment for cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Better monitoring of hearing and information about ototoxicity during chemotherapy could potentially reduce the fear of the symptoms of ototoxicity worsening. Furthermore, hearing monitoring would facilitate the detection of hearing loss at early stages of survivorship, which would facilitate earlier access to clinical interventions and longer term counselling.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCancer SurvivorsEar, InnerHearing LossNeoplasmsOtotoxicityTinnitusAdultHumansQuality of LifeAntineoplastic AgentsHearing lossLate effectsQuality of lifeSurvivorshipTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID34398361
PMCPMC9489560
OpenAlexW3196201528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.