ArticleActa neurochirurgica2021
Surgical management of anterior clinoidal meningiomas: consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Update on anterior clinoid process removal in anterior clinoid meningioma surgery: literature review, and a new didactical concept.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Pooled it
- Modern treatment of craniopharyngioma to improve outcomes: evidence of a change of paradigm.Endocrine · 2025Pooled it
- Single fraction and hypofractionated radiosurgery for perioptic meningiomas-tumor control and visual outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2023Pooled it
- Vascular-based compartmental resection of anterior clinoidal meningiomas: an inter-perforator microdebulking strategy.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Comparative outcomes of giant versus non-giant anterior clinoidal meningiomas: A single-center case series with extended follow-up.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Review
- Collision of pituitary neuroendocrine tumor and anterior clinoid meningioma treated with a two-stage minimally invasive surgical strategy: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
- Exoscopic extradural anterior clinoidectomy.Neurosurgical focus: Video · 2024Article
- Case report: Mirror paraclinoid aneurysm associated with mirror clinoidal meningioma.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Staged Strategies to Deal with Complex, Giant, Multi-Fossa Skull Base Tumors.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Neoplasms and tumor-like lesions of the sellar region: imaging findings with correlation to pathology and 2021 WHO classification.Neuroradiology · 2023Review
- Meningiomas with CNS invasion.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 18 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal management of clinoidal meningiomas (CMs) continues to be debated.
methodsWe constituted a task force comprising the members of the EANS skull base committee along with international experts to derive recommendations for the management of these tumors. The data from the literature along with contemporary practice patterns were discussed within the task force to generate consensual recommendations. RESULTS AND
conclusionThis article represents the consensus opinion of the task force regarding pre-operative evaluations, patient's counselling, surgical classification, and optimal surgical strategy. Although this analysis yielded only Class B evidence and expert opinions, it should guide practitioners in the management of patients with clinoidal meningiomas and might form the basis for future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.